2022
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2112187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival with Cemiplimab in Recurrent Cervical Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
192
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
9
192
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Survival was significantly longer with cemiplimab than with single‐agent chemotherapy for patients with recurrent cervical cancer after first‐line platinum‐containing chemotherapy, according to findings from a phase 3 trial. The findings were published recently in The New England Journal of Medicine 1 …”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Survival was significantly longer with cemiplimab than with single‐agent chemotherapy for patients with recurrent cervical cancer after first‐line platinum‐containing chemotherapy, according to findings from a phase 3 trial. The findings were published recently in The New England Journal of Medicine 1 …”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A Phase II trial, KEYNOTE-158 (NCT02628067), revealed that this PD-L1 inhibitor is safe and has produced manageable after-treatment effects [ 147 ], while in a Phase III clinical trial, KEYNOTE-862 (NCT036335567), patients with persistent, recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer received platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab, and pembrolizumab prolonged the patients’ PFS and overall survival (OS) [ 148 ]. Other PD-1 inhibitors, such as nivolumab (NCT02257528) [ 149 ], atezolizumab (NCT03340376) [ 150 ], and cemiplimab (NCT03257267) [ 151 ], were also studied in Phase II or Phase III trials. Similar to pembrolizumab, treatment with durvalumab concurrent with platinum-based chemoradiotherapy also improved the PFS of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (NCT03830866) [ 152 ].…”
Section: Cervical Cancer and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Afterwards, on the wave of these promising response rates, anti-PD-(L1) blockade was compared with standard of care in the EMPOWER-cervical1/GOG-3016/ENGOT-Cx9 phase III trial. 39 In this trial, patients with recurrent and metastatic CC resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive cemiplimab, an anti-PD- Is PD-L1-negative status an inappropriate candidate?…”
Section: Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%