2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surviving or thriving: The role of learning for the resilient performance of small firms

Abstract: Building on a longitudinal dataset of 245 small firms covering the period of the Global Financial Crisis, this study uses, in combination with fuzzy clustering, the N-State Classification and Ranking Belief Simplex (NCaRBS) technique. This technique, able to deal with ambiguous outcome variables, small datasets, incomplete data and relationships that have the potential to be non-linear, is used to explore the relationship between learning and the resilient performance of small firms. Our findings provide a fin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
2
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in organizational performance, especially performance decline (Cameron, Sutton, & Whetten, 1988;Weitzel & Jonsson, 1989;Zammuto & Cameron, 1985), have an impact on managerial behaviors, particularly in the situation of economic adversity or external threat (Battisti et al, 2019;Chattopadhyay, Glick, & Huber, 2001;Shirokova, Ivvonen, & Gafforova, 2019;Shirokova, Osiyevskyy, Laskovaia, & MahdaviMazdeh, 2020). A well-developed literature on strategic adaptation suggests threat perception can be considered as a catalyst for a strategic response (e.g., Gilbert, 2005;Laskovaia, Marino, Shirokova, & Wales, 2019).…”
Section: Economic Downturn Organizational Decline and Smes Strategimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Changes in organizational performance, especially performance decline (Cameron, Sutton, & Whetten, 1988;Weitzel & Jonsson, 1989;Zammuto & Cameron, 1985), have an impact on managerial behaviors, particularly in the situation of economic adversity or external threat (Battisti et al, 2019;Chattopadhyay, Glick, & Huber, 2001;Shirokova, Ivvonen, & Gafforova, 2019;Shirokova, Osiyevskyy, Laskovaia, & MahdaviMazdeh, 2020). A well-developed literature on strategic adaptation suggests threat perception can be considered as a catalyst for a strategic response (e.g., Gilbert, 2005;Laskovaia, Marino, Shirokova, & Wales, 2019).…”
Section: Economic Downturn Organizational Decline and Smes Strategimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the environment changes abruptly, firms need to adapt their behavior to the new circumstances. A country-wide or global economic crisis is a good example of a sudden environmental jolt that makes firms reconsider their strategic behavior to cope with the economic downturn (Archibugi, Filippetti, & Frenz, 2013;Battisti, Beynon, Pickernell, & Deakins, 2019;Doern, Williams, & Vorley, 2019;Kunc & Bhandari, 2011;Pollard & Hotho, 2006;Smallbone, Deakins, Battisti, & Kitching, 2012). Responding to an economic crisis, firms may employ two distinct approaches to organizational adaptation: exploration and exploitation (Gupta, Smith, & Shalley, 2006;March, 1991;Ngo, Bucic, Sinha, & Lu, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that learning allows firms to cope during the crisis (Weick and Sutcliffe 2011 ). Battisti et al ( 2019 ) examine the performance of small firms in New Zealand after the 2008 global financial crisis to understand which specific learning mechanism explains the post-crisis resilience of small firms. They find that the owner–manager’s learning goal orientation contributes to long-term sustained performance, whereas practice-based and proximal learning only helps short-term survival.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning from the crisis is a recursive, emergent, and active process (Elliott and MacPherson 2010 ). Policymakers and practitioners develop personal coaching and mentoring programs through formal (Battisti et al 2019 ) or informal methods (Saunders et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, SMEs can improve their learning systems and financial performance because they are closer to their employees, which makes it easier to capture, transfer and better apply the knowledge learned [50,61]. Therefore, organizational learning is visualized as a capacity that helps to achieve better organizational practices, such as the adoption of social responsibility, and an increase of financial performance in SMEs [62,63]. From the theoretical and empirical context, we developed the following hypothesis: Hypothesis 2 (H2).…”
Section: Organizational Learning and Financial Performancementioning
confidence: 99%