2000
DOI: 10.1348/000711200160705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survivor guilt, submissive behaviour and evolutionary theory: The down‐side of winning in social comparison

Abstract: In prior research submissive behaviour has been studied in relation to social comparison. Evolutionary theory conceptualized submissive behaviour as a fear-based self-protective strategy when in a subordinate position. In this study we hypothesized that survivor guilt, the type of guilt associated with feeling better off than others, is also linked to submissive behaviour. The Interpersonal Guilt Questionnaire, the Submissive Behaviour Inventory, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised and the Automatic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Baumeister et al 26 indicated that the interpersonal nature of guilt was interpretable in the social science frameworks of symbolic interactionism, social learning theory, socialization theory, Sullivanian personality theory, and Heideggerian phenomenology. Similarly, O'Connor and colleagues 36 postulated that altruistic behavior between members of a social group was similar to survivor guilt as it related to concern for others and the promotion of sharing. They further stated that survivor guilt "promotes group cohesion, inhibits anti-social competition, and leads people to engage in altruistic behavior."…”
Section: Survivor Guilt In Social Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baumeister et al 26 indicated that the interpersonal nature of guilt was interpretable in the social science frameworks of symbolic interactionism, social learning theory, socialization theory, Sullivanian personality theory, and Heideggerian phenomenology. Similarly, O'Connor and colleagues 36 postulated that altruistic behavior between members of a social group was similar to survivor guilt as it related to concern for others and the promotion of sharing. They further stated that survivor guilt "promotes group cohesion, inhibits anti-social competition, and leads people to engage in altruistic behavior."…”
Section: Survivor Guilt In Social Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Guilt can occur in the presence of isolation, but survivor guilt is always interpersonal in origin and function because it occurs in reference to a victim of some kind and plays an adaptive role in the maintenance of relationships between people. 28,36 The word process was also important to consider because it makes reference to survivor guilt in the form of a trajectory. This idea was implied by Wilson et al, 35 who noted that in an acute trauma model of survivor guilt, a person cycled between anxiety and depression, which subsided over time.…”
Section: Interpersonal Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this may be maladaptive for the individual with regard to group competition, altruistic individuals with high empathy-based guilt may have provided survival advantages in the competition between groups in our evolutionary history [19,29,30]. Empathy-based guilt and self-hate as measured on the IGQ-67 were associated with depressive symptoms and this association remained even when controlling for levels of shame [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, guilt may arise simply by observing one who is luckier than someone else, who has been unjustly penalized by chance (altruistic guilt). A traditional example of altruistic guilt is represented by air crash survivors, where empathy and feelings of sorrow might even lead to sacrifice oneself in the attempt to mitigate victim's suffering, even knowing others bad luck has occurred by chance (Baumeister, 2005;Hoffman, 1981;O'Connor et al, 2000;Weiss et al, 1986]. Altruistic guilt clearly differs from both ''kin selected'' and ''reciprocal'' altruistic behaviors, where individuals intentionally enter into a pact to exchange favours [Humphrey, 1997].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%