2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survivor: The role of innovation in firms’ survival

Abstract: This paper explores the relationship between innovation and the survival of manufacturing firms in the Netherlands. The determinants of the survival probability of a firm, traditionally identified in the size and age of a firm, are extended to include the ability of a firm to introduce an innovation in the market. The empirical analysis combines economic and demographic data from the Business Register of the population of firms active in the Netherlands with data on innovation derived from the second Community… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
234
0
12

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 436 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
17
234
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In fast changing industries, soon after entry firms have a lower probability of survival, but once the initial period has been passed, their life expectancy increases significantly (Audretsch, 1995;Audretsch and Mahmood, 1999). Cefis and Marsili (2006) find that innovative firms are more likely to survive than are non-innovative firms. Finally, the timing of innovation (Christensen, Suarez, and Utterback, 1998), commercial strategy and relatedness among business lines (Mitchell, 1991;Willard and Cooper, 1985), and 1 A non-exhaustive list of contributions includes, among others, Haltiwanger (1997), Foster, Haltiwanger, the nature of the technological regime (Audretsch, 1991) have a strong influence on the life duration of new firms.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In fast changing industries, soon after entry firms have a lower probability of survival, but once the initial period has been passed, their life expectancy increases significantly (Audretsch, 1995;Audretsch and Mahmood, 1999). Cefis and Marsili (2006) find that innovative firms are more likely to survive than are non-innovative firms. Finally, the timing of innovation (Christensen, Suarez, and Utterback, 1998), commercial strategy and relatedness among business lines (Mitchell, 1991;Willard and Cooper, 1985), and 1 A non-exhaustive list of contributions includes, among others, Haltiwanger (1997), Foster, Haltiwanger, the nature of the technological regime (Audretsch, 1991) have a strong influence on the life duration of new firms.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, service SMEs that act accordingly will have more possibilities to significantly increase their level of performance and competitiveness (de Brentani, 1989;Mohammed-Salleh & Easingwood, 1993;Griffin, 1997;Cefis & Marsili, 2006). This paper investigates the effects of external environmental, financial and human barriers on innovation in Mexican service SMEs.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those enterprises that survive do so because they are capable of regular and focused change [6,7]. New ventures that innovate are able to offer new or different goods or services to the market, enabling them to differentiate themselves from their competitors.…”
Section: Drucker [1] (P 28)mentioning
confidence: 99%