2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0981(03)00219-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survivorship of juvenile barnacles and mussels: spatial dependence and the origin of alternative communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interval-specific mortality rates of germlings were calculated as above [43]. The number of arriving barnacles in a sampling interval was estimated from the difference between the observed number at the end of an interval, and the expected number at the end given the number at the start multiplied by spring and summer survivorships for juvenile barnacles in New England [42]. Final estimates of the slope to estimate PCIS were those of the reduced major axis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interval-specific mortality rates of germlings were calculated as above [43]. The number of arriving barnacles in a sampling interval was estimated from the difference between the observed number at the end of an interval, and the expected number at the end given the number at the start multiplied by spring and summer survivorships for juvenile barnacles in New England [42]. Final estimates of the slope to estimate PCIS were those of the reduced major axis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have experimentally shown sharp thresholds in barnacle and mussel recruitment and rates of predation on mussels and non-linear changes in fucoid recruitment with clearing size, which mimics the damage due to ice scour (Petraitis & Dudgeon 1999, Dudgeon & Petraitis 2001, Petraitis et al 2003. They demonstrated that these effects translated into changes in adult densities and divergent successional patterns (Petraitis & Dudgeon 2005, Methratta & Petraitis 2008) and that some areas that were seaweed stands are now becoming mussel beds (Petraitis et al 2009).…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Data collected in the clearing experiment were analysed with mixed model ANOVA with location (random) and clearing size (fixed) as orthogonal factors. Four a priori planned contrasts (a: 0, 0.6, 1.2 and 2.4 v. 4.8; b: 0, 0.6 and 1.2 v. 2.4; c: 0 and 0.6 v. 1.2; d: 0 v. 0.6) identical to those used by Petraitis et al (2003) tested the presence of thresholds in abundance of taxa with increasing clearing size. Edge effects were tested with three a priori planned contrasts following a separate one-way fixed factor ANOVA of all treatments (centres of five clearing sizes and edges from three clearings !1.2 m) at both locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McCook & Chapman, 1992;Speidel et al, 2001) and the ability of Fucus to take over, dominate and persist in clearings in other canopy habitats such as Ascophyllum beds (e.g. Petraitis et al, 2003;Jenkins et al, 2004). All of these studies, however, were conducted in the intertidal zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation