2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5214(03)00138-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility of apricot and peach fruit to Monilinia laxa during phenological stages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
33
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that the development of M. laxa on fruit is dependent on fruit species (Mari et al 2004), maturity stage (Fourie and Holz 2003) or the chemical composition of the fruit (Mari et al 2003). There is no evidence for host specificity of M. laxa (Côté 2004), and in the present study, peach fruit had higher firmness, SSC and SSC/TA ratio than did nectarines (Table 1), so observed difference can be related to genetic factors, maturity and chemical composition of the fruit.…”
Section: In Vivo Testcontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…It is known that the development of M. laxa on fruit is dependent on fruit species (Mari et al 2004), maturity stage (Fourie and Holz 2003) or the chemical composition of the fruit (Mari et al 2003). There is no evidence for host specificity of M. laxa (Côté 2004), and in the present study, peach fruit had higher firmness, SSC and SSC/TA ratio than did nectarines (Table 1), so observed difference can be related to genetic factors, maturity and chemical composition of the fruit.…”
Section: In Vivo Testcontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…In contrast to the preharvest period, fungicides are not routinely applied between shuck fall and pit hardening, therefore increasing the probability of latent infection establishment in immature fruit. Similar results have also been reported in other stonefruits elsewhere, including prunes (Luo & Michailides 2001) and peaches (Mari et al 2003). The relationship between early season latent infection and brown rot at harvest is complex and not well understood, as not all immature green fruit with latent infections develop brown rot symptoms at harvest (Wade & Cruickshank 1992).…”
Section: Results and Discussion Fruit Susceptibility Studiessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Ripening is the sum of multiple biochemical and physiological changes that occur at the final stage of fruit development (Giovannoni 2001). BR resistance decreases in stone fruit between pit hardening and physiological maturity (Biggs and Northover 1988;Mari et al 2003). This change has been suggested to be due to a concomitant drop in the fruit phenolic content Bostock 2006, 2007;Villarino et al 2011).…”
Section: Maturity Date As Covariate In Mqm Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%