1975
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.35.1240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility of Interconfiguration-Fluctuation Compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
146
2

Year Published

1976
1976
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
12
146
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, magnetic susceptibility at low magnetic field (50 Oe) reveals a broad maximum typical of MV state [6]. However, further studies of the magnetic susceptibility (unpublished) revealed that its values are too high to follow the model proposed by Sales and Wohlleben [7] for MV state. In fact, a presence of ferromagnetic impurities in a specimen may be a source of the enlarged value of susceptibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…On the other hand, magnetic susceptibility at low magnetic field (50 Oe) reveals a broad maximum typical of MV state [6]. However, further studies of the magnetic susceptibility (unpublished) revealed that its values are too high to follow the model proposed by Sales and Wohlleben [7] for MV state. In fact, a presence of ferromagnetic impurities in a specimen may be a source of the enlarged value of susceptibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…2) We want now to discuss the possibility of interconfiguration fluctuations (ICF) such as those proposed by Hirst [78] and Sales and Wohlleben [79] for rare earth compounds. This model was used to analyze the XPS spectra of the thulium compounds TmSe and TmTe, where the lines corresponding to the 4f 12 and 4f " configurations are found side by side [80].…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Maximum Of Y At Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, one should insist upon the fact that the observed magnetic susceptibility of mixed-valence rare earth compounds has been justified by the ICF model in a phenomenological way only [79], and that the quantitative demonstration of this behaviour is given starting from the Friedel-Anderson virtual bound state (VBS) model [83]. The relative validity of ICF and VBS models has been recently discussed by Hirst [84] and by Coqblin et al [85].…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Maximum Of Y At Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 shows examples of the χ(T) dependence for y = 0.13 and 0.63, which correspond to the FV and HF case, respectively. A broad maximum is visible at 400 K for y = 0.13 and in FV systems it is often interpreted using the interconfiguration fluctuation (ICF) model [22][23][24], which describes the magnetic susceptibility employing the average of the configurations 4f n and 4f n−1 , separated by the energy E ex . For the case of cerium the magnetic susceptibility is written as:…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noticed that two notations of the effective temperature are used in literature, (T + T SF ) [23] or (T 2 + T SF 2 ) 1/2 [24,26].The latter can be also interpreted as the broadening of the 4f energy levels and in principle can include different contributions to the spin fluctuations (thermal excitations, quantum mechanical fluctuations, the effect of the 4f-conduction electron hybridization). We have tested both options and similar order of parameters values has been obtained, but (T 2 + T SF 2 ) 1/2 provides clearly better quality of the fit, hence better describes the system studied.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%