2022
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2037397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility of sheep to experimental co-infection with the ancestral lineage of SARS-CoV-2 and its alpha variant

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Virus isolation was successful in one of three cattle; however, neutralizing antibody levels were absent or low in most animals after 1 month, suggesting a minor role of cattle in SARS‐CoV‐2 epidemiology 21 . In a different experimental study, sheep‐derived cell cultures supported SARS‐CoV‐2 replication, but experimental infection of sheep resulted in low viral RNA levels in nasal and oral swabs right after challenge, and in the respiratory tract and lymphoid tissues 4 and 8 days later, indicating a low susceptibility of sheep to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection 22 . Experimentally infected poultry (chickens, ducks, and turkeys) were found to be resistant to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection 23 .…”
Section: Animals In Which Natural or Experimental Sars‐cov‐2 Infectio...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Virus isolation was successful in one of three cattle; however, neutralizing antibody levels were absent or low in most animals after 1 month, suggesting a minor role of cattle in SARS‐CoV‐2 epidemiology 21 . In a different experimental study, sheep‐derived cell cultures supported SARS‐CoV‐2 replication, but experimental infection of sheep resulted in low viral RNA levels in nasal and oral swabs right after challenge, and in the respiratory tract and lymphoid tissues 4 and 8 days later, indicating a low susceptibility of sheep to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection 22 . Experimentally infected poultry (chickens, ducks, and turkeys) were found to be resistant to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection 23 .…”
Section: Animals In Which Natural or Experimental Sars‐cov‐2 Infectio...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…R esidents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in the United States have suffered a disproportionate number of deaths from SARS-CoV-2 (1). Testing frequency and result turnaround times may be more relevant than test sensitivity for infection control (2,3), information that might be used to guide infection control efforts in congregate living facilities (4). Semimonthly testing for SARS-CoV-2 was mandated in Florida, USA, for all employees and residents of skilled nursing, elder care, and assisted living facilities beginning June 7, 2020 (5).…”
Section: Research Lettersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under experimental conditions, various animal species could be infected with SARS-CoV-2, including nonhuman primates, felids, canids, mustelids, white-tailed deer, and several species of Cricetidae rodents; poultry or swine were not susceptible (2). For domestic ruminants such as cattle, sheep, or goats, susceptibility after experimental inoculation was low; only a small proportion of animals could be infected without animal-to-animal transmission (3)(4)(5). Furthermore, 26 cattle exposed in the field to SARS-CoV-2 by contact with their infected keepers tested negative by reverse transcription PCR (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from humans, SARS-CoV-2 was also found to naturally infect diverse domestic and wild animal species, including farm minks ( 19 , 20 ), companion pets (e.g., cats, dogs, ferrets, Syrian hamsters) ( 21 23 ), zoo animals (e.g., lions, tigers, cougars, snow leopards, gorillas, otters, hippopotami) ( 24 ), and free-ranging white-tailed deer ( 25 ). Furthermore, experimental infections in livestock species have determined low-level replication of ancestral variants in cattle ( 26 , 27 ), pigs ( 28 ), and sheep ( 27 , 29 ). These observations signify the broad host range of SARS-CoV-2 and the risk of infection by heavily mutated variants to give rise to potential reservoirs that may pose a further risk for spillover back to humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%