2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility phase imaging with comparison to R2* mapping of iron-rich deep grey matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21,22 Although it does have nonlocal dipole field effects that can potentially be alleviated by susceptibility mapping, it involves fewer assumptions caused by the ill-posed problem of dipole de-convolution, is still widely used by researchers, and is more generally applicable because it is directly available on some scanners. Furthermore, both post-mortem [23][24][25][26] and in vivo 27 studies confirmed associations between the local SWI-filtered phase shift and the underlying magnetic susceptibility, which is affected by the tissue iron content. In the present study, both mean phase (indicative of overall iron content) and mean phase of low-phase voxels (MP-LPV) (indicative of high iron content) measures were used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…21,22 Although it does have nonlocal dipole field effects that can potentially be alleviated by susceptibility mapping, it involves fewer assumptions caused by the ill-posed problem of dipole de-convolution, is still widely used by researchers, and is more generally applicable because it is directly available on some scanners. Furthermore, both post-mortem [23][24][25][26] and in vivo 27 studies confirmed associations between the local SWI-filtered phase shift and the underlying magnetic susceptibility, which is affected by the tissue iron content. In the present study, both mean phase (indicative of overall iron content) and mean phase of low-phase voxels (MP-LPV) (indicative of high iron content) measures were used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Additionally, there are conflicting results as to the relationship between R 2 *, which is also used as a measure of iron content, and phase. Walsh and Wilman (Walsh and Wilman, 2011) affirmed a relationship between R 2 * and phase in individual structures. On the other hand, (Yan et al, 2012) found no statistically significant correlation between R 2 * and phase in seven structures in the brain, including the SN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While phase is sensitive to paramagnetic iron species; it is also sensitive to inhomogeneities in the magnetic field, filtering, structure shape (Walsh and Wilman, 2011), orientation of neuronal fibers (Lee et al, 2010), myelin content (Duyn et al, 2007), and the orientation of the brain with respect to the main magnetic field (B 0 ) (Schafer et al, 2009). However, the aforementioned non-iron factors should not significantly affect the phase given that the SN is a grey matter nucleus and the relative proximity of the SN volumes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a parameter that reflects iron variation in the brain, phase value depends highly on filtering, structure size, shape and local environment. The edge effect could cause the fluctuation of phase values [31] and the difference of the magnetic susceptibility in the surrounding tissue besides the iron content [28], which would reduce the apparent phase shift in large uniform structures such as deep gray nuclei [28], [32]. Furthermore, blood volume as well as higher ferritin content both contributed to the contrast of gray matter and WM in phase imaging [33], and the phase shift also depended on the developmental variation of the cerebral venous system in infants [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%