1993
DOI: 10.1128/aac.37.12.2517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility testing of fungi: current status of the standardization process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of broth microdilution tests show fair to good agreement with those obtained by the original method (3,10,11,13,23,38), depending on the agent tested. In general, these studies showed that the correlations were better for water-soluble agents such as fluconazole and flucytosine than for relatively insoluble agents such as itraconazole and ketoconazole.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…The results of broth microdilution tests show fair to good agreement with those obtained by the original method (3,10,11,13,23,38), depending on the agent tested. In general, these studies showed that the correlations were better for water-soluble agents such as fluconazole and flucytosine than for relatively insoluble agents such as itraconazole and ketoconazole.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Because of a lack of standardized tests, the comparisons of MICs from laboratory to laboratory and from study to study should be interpreted with caution. Moreover, no relationship has been established between in vitro results and patients' responses (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, resistance to the triazole FZ has been described in C. albicans strains isolated from the oral cavities of AIDS patients in different parts of the world (2, 5-8, 15, 18, 22, 24, 25, 28, 29, 32, 34, 36). The absence in most cases of comparative susceptibility data for alternative azole antifungal agents in these isolates still leaves open the question of whether cross-resistance to azole drugs in C. albicans is a general phenomenon.All of the azole antifungal agents share certain properties that makes in vitro susceptibility testing difficult, mainly partial inhibition of fungal growth that makes MIC endpoint determinations both very difficult and subjective (12,29,35). In the proposed standard of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (23), endpoints for azoles are determined visually at 48 h and the MIC is defined as the lowest drug concentration that reduces growth by 80% relative to the growth of the control (MIC 80%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the azole antifungal agents share certain properties that makes in vitro susceptibility testing difficult, mainly partial inhibition of fungal growth that makes MIC endpoint determinations both very difficult and subjective (12,29,35). In the proposed standard of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (23), endpoints for azoles are determined visually at 48 h and the MIC is defined as the lowest drug concentration that reduces growth by 80% relative to the growth of the control (MIC 80%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%