2008
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.mra2008083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility to Hydrogen Absorption and Hydrogen Thermal Desorption of Titanium Alloys Immersed in Neutral Fluoride Solution under Applied Potential

Abstract: The susceptibility to hydrogen absorption and hydrogen thermal desorption of titanium alloys has been investigated in a neutral 2.0% NaF solution at 37C under various applied cathodic potentials. Ti-0.2Pd, Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-11.3Mo-6.6Zr-4.3Sn alloys absorb hydrogen under less noble potentials than À1:5 V, À1:9 V and À1:4 V versus a saturated calomel electrode, respectively. The amounts of absorbed hydrogen of Ti-0.2Pd, Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-11.3Mo-6.6Zr-4.3Sn alloys under an applied potential of À2:0 V for 24 h are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…28) With immersion in the neutral 0.2% and 2.0% NaF solutions at 37 C for 24 h, the critical potential for the hydrogen absorption of commercial pure titanium was À1:2 V. 28) Similarly, the critical potentials for the hydrogen absorption of Ti-0.2Pd, Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-11.3Mo-6.6Zr-4.3Sn alloys were À1:5 V, À1:9 V and À1:4 V in the 2.0% NaF solution at 37 C for 24 h, respectively. 22) Thus, the susceptibility of applied potential to the hydrogen absorption of Ni-Ti superelastic alloy is probably higher than those of titanium and its alloys. Furthermore, for the same applied potential or same applied current density, the amount of absorbed hydrogen of Ni-Ti superelastic alloy is much larger than those of titanium and its alloys reported previously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…28) With immersion in the neutral 0.2% and 2.0% NaF solutions at 37 C for 24 h, the critical potential for the hydrogen absorption of commercial pure titanium was À1:2 V. 28) Similarly, the critical potentials for the hydrogen absorption of Ti-0.2Pd, Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-11.3Mo-6.6Zr-4.3Sn alloys were À1:5 V, À1:9 V and À1:4 V in the 2.0% NaF solution at 37 C for 24 h, respectively. 22) Thus, the susceptibility of applied potential to the hydrogen absorption of Ni-Ti superelastic alloy is probably higher than those of titanium and its alloys. Furthermore, for the same applied potential or same applied current density, the amount of absorbed hydrogen of Ni-Ti superelastic alloy is much larger than those of titanium and its alloys reported previously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, for the same applied potential or same applied current density, the amount of absorbed hydrogen of Ni-Ti superelastic alloy is much larger than those of titanium and its alloys reported previously. 22,28) For example, the amount of absorbed hydrogen of commercial pure titanium immersed in 2.0% NaF solution at 37 C under an applied potential of À1:2 V (current density of approximately 10-20 A/m 2 ) for 24 h is approximately 60-70 mass ppm. 28) Hence, when the same amount of hydrogen evolves on the surface of the specimen, the amount of hydrogen absorbed into Ni-Ti superelastic alloy is presumably larger than those absorbed into titanium and its alloys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…15) In contrast, for Ti-6Al-4V alloy immersed in neutral NaF solution, the hydrogen absorption behavior may be related to the surface conditions rather than an electrochemical factor. 16) Therefore, it is necessary to confirm experimentally the extent to which the hydrogen absorption behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy is related to its electrochemical behavior in APF solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%