2021
DOI: 10.2147/idr.s325520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility to Imipenem/Relebactam of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates from Chinese Intra-Abdominal, Respiratory and Urinary Tract Infections: SMART 2015 to 2018

Abstract: In recent years, less options are available for treating carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The present study investigates the susceptibility rates to imipenem/relebactam for the treatment of intraabdominal infections (IAIs), respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa in China. Patients and Methods: A total of 1886 P. aeruginosa and 1889 A. baumannii isolates were collected in 21 cen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al analyzed a collection of 835 non-imipenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa isolates from the global SMART surveillance program, and the susceptibility rates to imipenem/relebactam were 64.4%, and the MIC 50 and MIC 90 values were 2/4 mg/L and >32/4 mg/L, respectively. Compared with our data, the susceptibility percentages were very similar, but the MIC 90 value was 2-fold higher [36]. In our study, imipenem/ B).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Zhang et al analyzed a collection of 835 non-imipenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa isolates from the global SMART surveillance program, and the susceptibility rates to imipenem/relebactam were 64.4%, and the MIC 50 and MIC 90 values were 2/4 mg/L and >32/4 mg/L, respectively. Compared with our data, the susceptibility percentages were very similar, but the MIC 90 value was 2-fold higher [36]. In our study, imipenem/ B).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…[11][12][13] In the past decade, however, PNM caused by NFGNB, especially A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa has increased year by year with a concomitant increase in drug resistance. According to one report, the carbapenem resistance rate of A. baumannii in intensive care units can be as high as 60-70%, 14 and therefore the clinical treatment of patients is extremely difficult. With the widespread use of antibiotics, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa have become huge clinical threats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If two in vitro active agents are not available, in vitro synergy studies are valuable in choosing the most appropriate targeted combination scheme ( Piperaki et al., 2019 ). Novel antibiotics, including ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, and cefepime-zidebactam, have significantly poor in vitro activity against XDR- A. baumannii complex, while exhibiting excellent in vitro efficacy against CRE or CR- P. aeruginosa ( Biedenbach et al., 2015 ; Livermore et al., 2017 ; Sader et al., 2017a ; Groft et al., 2021 ; Jean et al., 2021 ; Liu et al., 2021 ; Zhang et al., 2021a ). In contrast, cefiderocol, a novel siderophore modified from ceftazidime, exhibited excellent in vitro activity against several carbapenem-NS GNB species, including A. baumannii complex ( Hsueh et al., 2019 ); however, compared to the best available therapy, higher all-cause mortality rates were observed during the early hospitalization course when cefiderocol was administered for the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia and BSI caused by CR- Acinetobacter species ( Bassetti et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Antibiotic Treatment Against Cr- or Xdr-gnbmentioning
confidence: 99%