2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2024.117699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suspect screening analysis by tandem mass spectra from metabolomics to exposomics

Changzhi Shi,
Junjie Yang,
Zecang You
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suspect screening holds a middle ground bridging targeted and non-targeted worlds and can occasionally be considered a subset of non-targeted procedures when NTA data are selectively analyzed. , Both nonselective MS 1 and user-defined MS 2 diagnostic ions (of known analytes/substructures) are used as opposed to de novo structural dereplication for NTA. Suspect screening can leverage community-based chemical databases and spectral libraries (with diagnostic information) to screen and annotate compounds, including spectral database screening, substructure-guided screening, derivatization-assisted screening, etc . Since these libraries are “crowd-sourced” or developed by well-funded institutions/enterprises, they are substantially larger than in-house libraries while maintaining a level of confidence from chemical standards and curation, as represented by the NIST/WILEY GC Library 2023 (>2 million spectra) and mzCloud , (>12 million spectra).…”
Section: Toward Merging Targeted and Non-targeted Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Suspect screening holds a middle ground bridging targeted and non-targeted worlds and can occasionally be considered a subset of non-targeted procedures when NTA data are selectively analyzed. , Both nonselective MS 1 and user-defined MS 2 diagnostic ions (of known analytes/substructures) are used as opposed to de novo structural dereplication for NTA. Suspect screening can leverage community-based chemical databases and spectral libraries (with diagnostic information) to screen and annotate compounds, including spectral database screening, substructure-guided screening, derivatization-assisted screening, etc . Since these libraries are “crowd-sourced” or developed by well-funded institutions/enterprises, they are substantially larger than in-house libraries while maintaining a level of confidence from chemical standards and curation, as represented by the NIST/WILEY GC Library 2023 (>2 million spectra) and mzCloud , (>12 million spectra).…”
Section: Toward Merging Targeted and Non-targeted Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suspect screening can leverage community-based chemical databases and spectral libraries (with diagnostic information) to screen and annotate compounds, including spectral database screening, substructure-guided screening, derivatization-assisted screening, etc. 239 Since these libraries are “crowd-sourced” or developed by well-funded institutions/enterprises, they are substantially larger than in-house libraries while maintaining a level of confidence from chemical standards and curation, as represented by the NIST/WILEY GC Library 2023 (>2 million spectra) and mzCloud 240 , 241 (>12 million spectra). Suspect screening thus emerges as an avenue to expand analytical coverages (from targeted analyses) with generally higher annotation confidence than non-targeted approaches.…”
Section: Toward Merging Targeted and Non-targeted Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%