2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suspended sediment load prediction using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction performance is also visualized in this study using scatter plots, boxplots, normalized Taylor diagrams and heat maps. The scatter plot is the most common graph to make a direct comparison between predicted and observed outputs (Emamgholizadeh & Demneh, 2019, Hamaamin et al, 2019, Hassanpour et al, 2019, Sharghi et al, 2019, Tabatabaei et al, 2019. A normalized Taylor diagram plots together R, RMSE and normalized standard deviation; the closer the model performance point in the diagram to the "observed" point (RMSE = 0, R = 1, normalized standard deviation = 1), the better the performance of the model is (Taylor, 2001).…”
Section: [Table 5]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction performance is also visualized in this study using scatter plots, boxplots, normalized Taylor diagrams and heat maps. The scatter plot is the most common graph to make a direct comparison between predicted and observed outputs (Emamgholizadeh & Demneh, 2019, Hamaamin et al, 2019, Hassanpour et al, 2019, Sharghi et al, 2019, Tabatabaei et al, 2019. A normalized Taylor diagram plots together R, RMSE and normalized standard deviation; the closer the model performance point in the diagram to the "observed" point (RMSE = 0, R = 1, normalized standard deviation = 1), the better the performance of the model is (Taylor, 2001).…”
Section: [Table 5]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four performance measures are selected to evaluate the models’ performances, namely the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R 2 ), and ranking mean (RM). MAE, RMSE, and R 2 have been commonly used in SSL prediction studies 2 , 8 10 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 37 , 38 , 69 , while RM was used by Ahmed et al 70 as a method to rank overall model performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study showed bagging-M5P to be superior to the classical M5P, reduced error pruning tree (REPT), instance-based learning (IBK), and hybridized versions of the REPT model. Tabatabaei et al 10 predicted SSL using data from the Ramian hydrological station on the Ghorichay River, Iran by utilizing an SRC model optimized with the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), which increased prediction efficiency. In the study by Uca et al 4 , multiple linear regression (MLR) and ANN were tested to predict SSL for the Jenderam catchment, Malaysia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e study of MOEA/D has been a hot topic lately [1]. It has proved to be amongst the highly competitive and dominating Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) alongside other algorithms such as Multiobjective Differential Evolution (MODE) [2], Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) [3], and Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) [4]. Like other evolutionary algorithms (EAs), MOEA/D is also a populationbased MOEA, and it is inspired by a decomposition mechanism that decomposes a multiobjective problem (MOP) into a set of single-objective optimization subproblems that are equivalent to the population of candidate solutions (on other MOEAs), where each subproblem is assigned with a unique weight vector [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%