2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-8641(99)00058-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suspension of Ganea fibrations and a Hopf invariant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove the result above we shall use the approach in [26] overcoming the obstacles created by the lack of good homology properties in exterior homotopy theory. To prove the result above we shall use the approach in [26] overcoming the obstacles created by the lack of good homology properties in exterior homotopy theory.…”
Section: Ganea Conjecture On Proper Ls-categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove the result above we shall use the approach in [26] overcoming the obstacles created by the lack of good homology properties in exterior homotopy theory. To prove the result above we shall use the approach in [26] overcoming the obstacles created by the lack of good homology properties in exterior homotopy theory.…”
Section: Ganea Conjecture On Proper Ls-categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the σ i cat (X) (see [32]) is the smallest n such that the i-fold suspension of the n-th Ganea fibration admits a section:…”
Section: Fiberwise Functorial Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are invariants associated by the above process to the fiberwise extension of the functors p p and ∞ ∞ . We will also use the invariant associated to the functor ∞ called σ category as in [32], which also coincides with the invariant r(M) of [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Iwase [32] was the first to produce a whole family of counterexamples, the lowest dimensional of which has dimension 10. According to [47], Vandembroucq [52] proves that no counterexamples to Ganea's conjecture can exist in dimension at most five. Also, for simply connected spaces of dimension 6 no such counterexamples can exist [48].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%