2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000100894.79413.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suspicious Findings in Reduction Mammaplasty Specimens: Review of 182 Consecutive Patients

Abstract: Breast reduction mammaplasty allows examination of specimens from a seemingly healthy population for the presence of proliferative breast disease. The authors reviewed the charts of all reduction mammaplasty patients of a single surgeon over 7.5 years for age, family history, mammographic results, unilateral or bilateral nature of the procedure, and final pathologic diagnosis. Of 182 patients, 168 had bilateral and 14 had unilateral breast reductions. Ages ranged from 16 to 79 years (average and median: 37 yea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the presence of pre-malignant changes in RP specimens may have been underestimated. However, BlansWeld et al (2004) found proliferative changes with atypical features in 3% of RP specimens. The 5.8% rate of atypical features registered in our study is therefore indicative of the fact that no underestimation had occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, the presence of pre-malignant changes in RP specimens may have been underestimated. However, BlansWeld et al (2004) found proliferative changes with atypical features in 3% of RP specimens. The 5.8% rate of atypical features registered in our study is therefore indicative of the fact that no underestimation had occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Assessing only the benign lesions associated with a high risk of breast cancer according to the American College of Pathologists, we demonstrated that 2.8% of our patients had this type of lesions in their RM specimen. Two studies from the United States reported even higher prevalence rates (5.5% (Blansfield et al , 2004) and 10.7% (Ishag et al , 2003)). Therefore, we believe that reporting these findings should not be overlooked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Standard use of preoperative imaging is still controversial in the literature. Mammography is variously recommended from the age of 30 years (24), from the age of 40 years (3,10,25), or for patients over the age of 50 years (26). Colwell et al (10) examined the incidence of breast cancer in reduction mammaplasties, and in their study, all patients had preoperative mammograms with negative results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, incidental discovery of atypical hyperplasia or LCIS lesions was not significantly associated with abnormal preoperative mammographic results. Blansfield et al (24) retrospectively reviewed reduction mammaplasty patients, of which 10% had proliferative changes. The majority (95%) of proliferative changes were found in patients over 30 years, with a highest portion of patients between ages 30 and 39 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%