2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainability analysis of dry treatment technologies for acid gas removal in waste-to-energy plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pursuing the maximum utilization of the sorbent is a key aspect in the optimization of flue gas cleaning operation. Feeding excess sodium bicarbonate to the DSI system not only results in a higher reactant cost per unit of acid gas removed, but also causes an increase in the generation of process residues, the disposal of which is a significant environmental drawback of dry acid gas removal systems. , Nonetheless, in some situations, the acid gas removal unit in a flue gas treatment line might be required to deviate from the optimal operating temperature, due to design constraints: e.g. if a flue gas treatment line using selective catalytic reduction (SCR) for the abatement of nitrogen oxides (NO X ) is considered, a typical SCR unit requires an inlet temperature of at least 200 °C, and the catalyst is subject to poisoning by the SO 2 content in the flue gas .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pursuing the maximum utilization of the sorbent is a key aspect in the optimization of flue gas cleaning operation. Feeding excess sodium bicarbonate to the DSI system not only results in a higher reactant cost per unit of acid gas removed, but also causes an increase in the generation of process residues, the disposal of which is a significant environmental drawback of dry acid gas removal systems. , Nonetheless, in some situations, the acid gas removal unit in a flue gas treatment line might be required to deviate from the optimal operating temperature, due to design constraints: e.g. if a flue gas treatment line using selective catalytic reduction (SCR) for the abatement of nitrogen oxides (NO X ) is considered, a typical SCR unit requires an inlet temperature of at least 200 °C, and the catalyst is subject to poisoning by the SO 2 content in the flue gas .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this review paper is to investigate the current situation in the field of waste-to-biogas both in Europe and worldwide. Previous reviews and research papers in this field mostly analyse technological progress [45][46][47][48][49], legislative limitations [50][51][52][53], case studies [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61], impacts on efficiency [62][63][64][65], environmental impacts [66][67][68][69][70] and problems associated with public opinion [71][72][73][74]. A study of challenges including a proposed implementation framework for sustainable municipal organic waste management using biogas technology in Asian countries has also recently been conducted [75].…”
Section: Aim Scope and Structure Of The Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emission of airborne pollutants (e.g., hydrogen chloride, HCl) is the main drawback of the thermal treatment of solid waste [66,67]. The availability of new sorbent materials [68] poses to the designers of new treatment process critical choices that may affect the environmental impacts of the plant under design [69,70]. In a life cycle perspective, the choice of the best dry treatment solution should consider not only the acid gas removal efficiency, but also the indirect environmental burdens related to supply of sorbents and disposal of solid process residues.…”
Section: Use Of Alternative Sorbents For Acid Gas Removal In Waste-tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 details the procedure adopted for the integration of the process simulation in a life cycle assessment framework. First, the functional unit (1 h of operation of a 360 t/day WtE plant), the waste types (a typical urban waste and a chlorine-rich waste representative of industrial refuses, see [69] for composition), and the emission limit value (2 mg/Nm 3 for HCl) are set. As the LCA aims to evaluate the environmental consequences of varying the repartition of HCl removal efficiency X in the 1st calcium-based stage (X 1 ) and in the 2nd sodium-based stage (X 2 ), four reference process configurations are defined (Ca_0 in which only sodium bicarbonate is used; and Ca_25, Ca_50 and Ca_75 in which, respectively, 25 wt %, 50 wt % and 75 wt % of the incoming HCl is removed in the first Ca(OH) 2 -based stage).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%