Sustainability and cost assessment of coastal vacation homes for energy retrofits

Abstract

Purpose Vacation rental homes, in general, have different energy usage characteristics than traditional residential homes mainly because of the occupancy pattern that changes on a weekly basis. These homes, predominantly larger in size, offer a greater scope for energy savings also because of the wasteful habits of their seasonal occupants. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the causes of energy inefficiencies prevalent in these homes so that appropriate retrofit choices can be offered to homeowners. Design/methodology/approach This research presents a case study of a vacation rental home whose energy consumption was investigated in depth and energy inefficiencies identified through modeling using energy modeling software, eQUEST. Simulations were performed to identify viable retrofit scenarios. Findings While improvement in the building envelope such as providing shades/overhangs on the windows, reducing infiltration and increasing insulation of the exterior wall did not show promising results for savings on energy cost, other improvements such as use of highly efficient lamps, tank-less water heater system and occupancy sensors showed viable investment options with shorter payback periods. It was also found that energy use intensity of sampled houses was about half of the average of US residential buildings, which could primarily be attributed to the seasonal nature of occupancy of these houses. Originality/value There is a dearth of literature pertaining to energy efficiency-related retrofits of coastal vacation homes. This research fills that gap to some extent by addressing this issue with an ultimate aim of assisting homeowners in retrofit decision-making.

Combining Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Assessments in Building Energy Renovation Projects

“…Therefore, energy renovation projects can help improving the energy performance of the existing building stock through the implementation of energy efficiency measures (EEMs) for the building envelope and/or the technical building systems. The effectiveness of EEMs has been extensively examined, in recent years, for different existing building categories, with cost-benefit analyses mainly focused on the evaluation of the annual energy savings and the payback period [4][5][6][7].…”

Implementing energy retrofits in existing hotel buildings using in-house teams: the decision-making process

“…As has been highlighted by Panthi et al (2017), during the M&V (specifically while reviewing the project results), both cases had focused on 'identifying the areas which need further improvement' (refer Figure 2). Additionally, these two cases had also paid attention towards 'determining the arrangements to be made to ensure the continuous functioning of the retrofitted system' which had not been highlighted in the literature.…”

Demand-side energy retrofit potential in existing office buildings

“…Among five organisational enablers, allocation of higher budgets for energy improvements was identified as the most effective enabler with a t-value of 10.712. According to Panthi et al (2017), opportunities for building managers to carry out energy improvements are restricted by the limited funding allocations. Leniency on expected payback of energy improvement projects was ranked second indicating that the building managers are conscious about the long-term benefits of energy improvements over lower payback periods.…”