Sustainability and Risks of Rural Household Livelihoods in Ethnic Tourist Villages: Evidence from China

Abstract

This study constructed a quantitative index system evaluating the level of livelihood sustainability of rural households in ethnic tourist villages and identified the main livelihood risks these households encountered. This was achieved by modifying the sustainable livelihood framework proposed by the Department for International Development (DFID) and testing it on three typical ethnic tourist villages in Guangxi, China (Jinkeng, Ping’an Zhuang, and Chengyang Eight). The results showed that the overall livelihood sustainability index was relatively poor. Livelihood assets and transforming structures and processes were the main factors that restricted the sustainability of household livelihoods. Social capital and financial capital values were lowest out of six types of livelihood capital examined. The lack of community participation of households adversely impacted the score of transforming structures and processes. Households encountered various livelihood risks. Generally, the livelihood issues that concerned most households were market, social, and education risks. However, when the farmers were enquired about a single risk that worried them the most, market, financial, and employment risks ranked the highest. Through quantifying the sustainability and risk of rural household livelihoods, guidelines and subsidies could be allocated to promote rural revitalization.

Does Tibetan Household Livelihood Capital Enhance Tourism Participation Sustainability? Evidence from China’s Jiaju Tibetan Village

“…For instance, household members with skills in cuisine are more likely to support hotel and restaurant businesses. People with limited education and skills may find it difficult to compete with urban firms when starting rural businesses [ 73 ]. Thus, skill training is indispensable for tourism business startups and community-based tourism development.…”

Assessing Food and Livelihood Security in Sea Salt Community: A GIAHS Study in Ban Laem, Phetchaburi, Thailand

“…0.0760 [83,84,[91][92][93] Informational asset LS7: The number of various types of access-to-information equipment (items) 0.0802 [94] Livelihood outcomes security (LOS)…”

“…Livelihoods are constructed upon a foundation of diverse assets, including natural, physical, human, social, financial, and other resources collectively known as "livelihood assets". We have identified specific sub-indicators related to physical, financial, and cultural assets through our prior studies [85,86,89,91,[98][99][100][101][102][103]. Inhabitants of GIAHS regions have accumulated profound traditional knowledge in agricultural production throughout their lives, underscoring the significance of rural culture for attracting tourism.…”

Alternative ecotourism perspectives within the protected conservation sites and farming communities amid environmental degradation and climate change-bound rural exercises

“…Analogously, the fundamental notion of sustainable livelihood practice is centered on five crucial posts (Tao and Wall, 2009). Hence, such pillars are livelihood assets: human capital, social capital, physical capital, natural capital, and financial capital (Rakodi, 1999; Tabares et al , 2022), and they are elemental to the poor, ethnic, and local communities (Liu et al ., 2022). Implicitly, the sixth capital outside the major five is intellectual capital, which is vital to indigenous knowledge and natural resource management for the locals.…”