Sustainability in Land Management: An Analysis of Stakeholder Perceptions in Rural Northern Germany

Abstract

Successful sustainable land management efforts rely on stakeholder support and integration of stakeholder knowledge. This study explored the views of sustainable land management expressed by land use stakeholders and how these views contribute to land users' self-perceptions. We examined stakeholder perceptions in four case study areas in rural northern Germany. The target groups consisted of representatives from (i) agriculture; (ii) forestry; (iii) water management and (iv) rural planning and development ("cross-sector" representatives). The data were gathered using 60 semi-structured interviews and were analyzed qualitatively. The results indicate that differences in perceptions are greater between stakeholder groups than between regions; regional land management issues shape the framework of negotiations and the redefinition of concepts, whereas stakeholder group affiliations shape mindsets. The economic dimension of sustainability was emphasized, particularly by land managers; however, the social dimension was underrepresented in the statements. Furthermore, there are considerable differences between stakeholder groups in terms of the ways in which the spatial and temporal scales of sustainable land use are perceived. This study underscores the importance of examining stakeholder knowledge and understanding the complexity of land management and its benefits such that consensual management strategies may be developed.

Defining Sustainability in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

“…While it is unwarranted to suggest that the community of West Yellowstone is not concerned with future generations, their continued focus on the economy and extra-local influences has created an environment where it is not a vocalized priority. Similar to what Lange et al (2015) found in northern Germany, shorter term concerns are more critical to residents' thinking at the present time, despite the fact that long-term planning will ensure a more successful transition toward sustainability.…”

“…Using four case studies in rural Germany, Lange et al, (2015) studied the perceptions of representatives from the agriculture, forestry, water management, and planning sectors. The authors' found that societal dimensions of sustainability were underrepresented in the perceptions of all these stakeholder groups, that economic dimensions were prioritized by most (especially land managers), and that environmental dimensions were often contextualized in regard to resource availability as opposed to biological diversity.…”

Assessing Landscape Ecological Risk in a Mining City: A Case Study in Liaoyuan City, China

“…Landscapes are typically impacted by multiple disturbances that operate at different spatial and temporal scales [13,14]. Therefore, in contrast to general ecological risk assessment, landscape ecological risk assessment comprehensively assesses various types of potential ecological impacts, and their cumulative effects.…”

Sustainability of Rural Nonprofit Organizations: Czech Republic and Beyond

“…These arguments suggest that the endemic developmental problems of rural areas constitute a distinct demand-side rationale for nonprofit organizations, a rationale that constitutes the ultimate, if implicit, core of the theoretical justification of rural partnerships as a rural development policy instrument (cf. [55][56][57]). …”