2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainability of donor-funded rural water supply and sanitation projects in Mbire district, Zimbabwe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, women are not involved in key decision making positions because they are not represented in the current executive committee and only 8.3% of the standing committees members are women. Low women representation in water committees were also reported elsewhere (Tadesse et al, 2013;Mwamsamali andMayo, 2014, Kwangware et al, 2014). In Mbire district, Zimbabwe, Kwangware et al (2014) reported that women representation in Water Committee is only 25.8%, which was perceived by majority of the respondents (76.3%) as adequate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, women are not involved in key decision making positions because they are not represented in the current executive committee and only 8.3% of the standing committees members are women. Low women representation in water committees were also reported elsewhere (Tadesse et al, 2013;Mwamsamali andMayo, 2014, Kwangware et al, 2014). In Mbire district, Zimbabwe, Kwangware et al (2014) reported that women representation in Water Committee is only 25.8%, which was perceived by majority of the respondents (76.3%) as adequate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Low women representation in water committees were also reported elsewhere (Tadesse et al, 2013;Mwamsamali andMayo, 2014, Kwangware et al, 2014). In Mbire district, Zimbabwe, Kwangware et al (2014) reported that women representation in Water Committee is only 25.8%, which was perceived by majority of the respondents (76.3%) as adequate. In majority of cases, social, economic and cultural reasons limited the women participation in the committees.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In order to evaluate the sustainability of a water service, several frameworks have already been developed and adopted worldwide, using specific and objective sustainability indices [15][16][17]. Interesting tools were also suggested by the IRC (International Water and Sanitation Centre) [18,19], where for instance the quality and quantity of water delivered, the distance/access to and reliability of water supply services were the main aspects taken into consideration.…”
Section: Development Of a Tool Based On Five Sustainability Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure of interventions can occur for several reasons, such as lack of community involvement in design (15,16), lack of ownership (17,18), abuse of funds or poor financial management, lack of willingness of community members to contribute (18)(19)(20), lack of communication and connectedness (21) and no ongoing support and acknowledgement of change (22)(23)(24). In addition to an increased understanding of success and failures in WASH interventions, there is a growing trend to use community participation to drive health programmes, based on the expectation working with communities can help ensure interventions are more relevant to local priorities (25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%