Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa

Abstract

BackgroundHealth information systems are central to strong health systems. They assist with patient and program management, quality improvement, disease surveillance, and strategic use of information. Many donors have worked to improve health information systems, particularly by supporting the introduction of electronic health information systems (EHIS), which are considered more responsive and more efficient than older, paper-based systems. As many donor-driven programs are increasing their focus on country ownership, sustainability of these investments is a key concern. This analysis explores the potential sustainability of EHIS investments in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe, originally supported by the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).MethodsUsing a framework based on sustainability theories from the health systems literature, this analysis employs a qualitative case study methodology to highlight factors that may increase the likelihood that donor-supported initiatives will continue after the original support is modified or ends.ResultsFindings highlight commonalities around possible determinants of sustainability. The study found that there is great optimism about the potential for EHIS, but the perceived risks may result in hesitancy to transition completely and parallel use of paper-based systems. Full stakeholder engagement is likely to be crucial for sustainability, as well as integration with other activities within the health system and those funded by development partners. The literature suggests that a sustainable system has clearly-defined goals around which stakeholders can rally, but this has not been achieved in the systems studied. The study also found that technical resource constraints – affecting system usage, maintenance, upgrades and repairs – may limit EHIS sustainability even if these other pillars were addressed.ConclusionsThe sustainability of EHIS faces many challenges, which could be addressed through systems’ technical design, stakeholder coordination, and the building of organizational capacity to maintain and enhance such systems. All of this requires time and attention, but is likely to enhance long-term outcomes.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1971-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cervical cancer data and data systems in limited‐resource settings: Challenges and opportunities

“…Most importantly, national cervical cancer programs are frequently underfunded, lacking program‐specific budgets to ensure adequate human and material resources . In this situation, it is difficult to justify allocating funds for collecting information and monitoring programs over delivering clinical services . As a result, many cervical cancer programs do not have funds dedicated to data and data systems, and monitoring and evaluation funds either do not exist or are well below the recommended 10% of total budget…”

“…National eHealth and information and communication technology (ICT) policies do not exist in many low‐resource settings; when in place, implementation is often piecemeal owing to challenges in “retrofitting” a coherent architecture that allows information exchange among existing systems. Insufficient connectivity, hardware, and staff training often lead to a lack of adoption of nationally endorsed patient‐level electronic record systems or aggregate systems . Inadequate funding for system maintenance, a limited local ICT workforce, and proprietary software restrictions present challenges for improving existing systems.…”

“…Limited coordination, training, and standardization of data practices result in low‐quality data. Conversely, failure to recognize the benefits of data use contributes to a lack of investment in the collection of high‐quality data …”

“…[5][6][7] In this situation, itisdifficulttojustifyallocatingfundsforcollectinginformationand monitoring programs over delivering clinical services. 8 As a result, manycervicalcancerprogramsdonothavefundsdedicatedtodata anddatasystems,andmonitoringandevaluationfundseitherdonot existorarewellbelowtherecommended10%oftotalbudget. 9 Cervical cancer programs often rely wholly on existing national…”

Information Technology–Assisted Treatment Planning and Performance Assessment for Severe Thalassemia Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Observational Study (Preprint)

“…In fact, the application of information systems to improve access to health care in developing countries has faced many failures related to a number of factors such as mismatch between ICT designs and local user actual needs, system maintenance, upgrades and repairs [7][8][9]. The shifting need in many LMICs from infectious diseases and primary health care to chronic non-communicable disorders (NCD) requiring tertiary care and specialized medical competencies is underscoring the urgent need of improving access to qualified consultation, patient monitoring and outcomes assessment.…”