Sustainability university rankings: a comparative analysis of UI green metric and the times higher education world university rankings

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to answer the research question: How to evaluate the structure of global university sustainability rankings according to the Berlin Principles (BP) framework. Design/methodology/approach The authors investigated two global sustainability rankings in universities, The UI green metric World University Ranking (WUR) and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THE-WUR). The authors performed content analysis regarding their evaluation criteria and assessed both rankings using the BP framework. Findings Results show that there is still a gap to be filled regarding the specificity of global university sustainability rankings. Although the THE-WUR had a better performance in this research, there are several items for improvement, especially regarding the methodological procedures. There are structural differences, limitations and points for improvement in both rankings. Besides, it may not be possible to have a unique and more appropriate ranking, but one that can be more suitable for a contextual reality. Practical implications This study can be helpful for university managers when deliberating on the most appropriate ranking for their institutions and better preparing their higher education institutions for participating in sustainability-related rankings. Besides, it suggests possible improvements on the rankings’ criteria. Social implications The authors shed light on challenges for improving the existing university sustainability rankings, besides generating insights for developing new ones. In a provocative but constructive perspective, the authors question their bases and understandings of being “the best university” regarding sustainability. Originality/value This is the first study that provides an in-depth analysis and comparison between two of the most important global university sustainability rankings.

The Influence of Lighting, Noise, and Temperature on the Academic Performance of Students amid Covid-19 Pandemic

“…This is in line with Kabirikopaei's (2021) findings that student performance increases when the temperature lowers from 25 to 20C (77 to 68F 2021) assessed present student commitment to sustainability and its impact on future intention to use sustainable development concepts. This paper proposes three parameters to measure the economic sustainability of college graduates (Galleli et al, 2021). Using participatory ecological learning, Ulfiani Rahman (2021) investigated the impact of self-efficacy and self-concept on student sustainability.…”

Education for Sustainable Development in Higher Education Rankings: Challenges and Opportunities for Developing Internationally Comparable Indicators

“…While a large number of assessment tools exist for sustainability and sustainable development in the higher education sector (e.g., AISHE 2.0, STARS, GASU, ASSC, PSIR, SAQ, SustainTool, UniSAF) [14][15][16][18][19][20], only a few international rankings so far have undertaken the task-most notably, the UI Green Metric and THE Impact Ranking. A handful of articles have reviewed the approaches used in these rankings [48][49][50][51], and several recognised the importance of ESD, but did not specifically focus on ESD. Other sustainability rankings likely exist, particularly at the national level.…”

Guest editorial

“…This leads to an ongoing challenge to report and to assess this contribution against, for example, university rankings. Galleli et al (2021) compare UI Green Metric and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings to contribute to governance, assessment and reporting of HEIs sustainability initiatives.…”