2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable application of coal bottom ash as fine aggregates in concrete: A comprehensive review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several review studies on the use of FA-BA as a concrete constituent [3842]. It is important to consider the use of bottom ash as a replacement for fine aggregate because it can have a negative effect on the mechanical properties of concrete, such as compressive and tensile strength [38,40]. Utilizing bottom ash as a cementitious material is also challenging due to its lower pozzolanic activity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several review studies on the use of FA-BA as a concrete constituent [3842]. It is important to consider the use of bottom ash as a replacement for fine aggregate because it can have a negative effect on the mechanical properties of concrete, such as compressive and tensile strength [38,40]. Utilizing bottom ash as a cementitious material is also challenging due to its lower pozzolanic activity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density at 10% CBA was 2399 kg/m 3 and decreased 7% when CBA was replaced at 50% by volume. Hamada et al [9] observed that the concrete density reduced as the proportion of CBA increased due to the porous formations and lower unit weight of CBA than fine aggregate.…”
Section: Density and Compressive Strength Of Seawater-concrete With 1...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultra-high-strength concrete is suitable for constructing longer bridges, tall buildings, and structures exposed to aggressive conditions [ 1 ]. However, the mass of ordinary Portland cement in ultra-high-strength concrete (UHSC) is usually 800 to 1150 kg/m 3 [ 2 ], which is twice or thrice the proportion of conventional cement in traditional concrete [ 3 5 ]; the formation of OPC needs a considerable proportion of energy and natural resources [ 6 ], which makes the immense proportion of CO 2 [ 7 ]. Making 1 ton of clinker is projected to need 6.5 to 7 mega-joules of energy and releases nearly [ 8 ] 0.90 to 1.0 tons of CO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%