2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable cleaner production of concrete with high volume copper slag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
41
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Copper slag has been a subject of great interest for some time as a sustainable construction material (Dhir, de Brito, Mangabhai, & Lye, 2017;Murari, Siddique, & Jain, 2015;Prem, Verma, & Ambily, 2018). Utilizing of the copper slag in building industry has a twofold ecological advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Copper slag has been a subject of great interest for some time as a sustainable construction material (Dhir, de Brito, Mangabhai, & Lye, 2017;Murari, Siddique, & Jain, 2015;Prem, Verma, & Ambily, 2018). Utilizing of the copper slag in building industry has a twofold ecological advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, it saves natural resources, on the other it is a form of reuse of industrial waste, so it does not have to be stored on landfills. Copper slag is widely used, among others as a material partially or completely replacing sand in concretes and mortars (Al-Jabri, Al-Saidy, & Taha, 2011;Kubissa, Jaskulski, & Simon, 2017;Prem et al, 2018). One of the chapters of Dhir et al book (Dhir et al, 2017) is devoted to this application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the CS-based concretes demonstrated an improved strength (compressive and flexural) and durability (chloride permeability and chloride sorptivity) compared with conventional concretes. In the study of Prem et al [17], the FU of 1 m 3 of concrete was not normalized to the 28-day compressive strength. Additionally, byproduct-based concretes showed a higher embodied energy and GWP compared with conventional concretes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A key element of LCA is a functional unit (FU) that must be shared by all the compared alternatives and to which all inputs and outputs of the raw materials, and their embodied energies and emissions, should be traced [15].For a proper comparison of the FUs of concrete alternatives (both conventional and byproduct-based), at least the following parameters should be comparable: (i) fresh properties of the concrete (e.g., the consistency); (ii) hardened properties of the concrete (e.g., the compressive strength); and (iii) the durability of the concrete (e.g., the water penetration). To achieve this, previous LCA studies have used two different concrete (CON) design methods: (i) concrete with a fixed slump range (CON-fix-SLUMP); or (ii) a concrete with a fixed water/cement (W/C) ratio (CON-fix-W/C) [16][17][18].Turk et al[16] used a fixed slump range of 185-205 mm in byproduct-based concretes in which sand had been partially replaced by foundry sand or steel slag and which contained FA as a mineral admixture. These authors showed that the ranges of the 28-day compressive strength and the water penetration depths were 30.1-45.3 MPa and 16-34 mm, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation