2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-71832006000100004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
155
0
30

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
155
0
30
Order By: Relevance
“…The major risk in this respect is of co-opting powerful actors to impose their own definition of transformation, and potentially to legitimize vested interests to serve different discourses, including those against radical change of the status quo (Tanner and Bahadur 2013). Several authors have shown how a similar phenomenon has occurred regarding the concepts of sustainable development (Lele 1991;Robinson 2004;Redclift 2005) and sustainable agriculture (Thompson 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The major risk in this respect is of co-opting powerful actors to impose their own definition of transformation, and potentially to legitimize vested interests to serve different discourses, including those against radical change of the status quo (Tanner and Bahadur 2013). Several authors have shown how a similar phenomenon has occurred regarding the concepts of sustainable development (Lele 1991;Robinson 2004;Redclift 2005) and sustainable agriculture (Thompson 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Da mesma forma, as grandes corporações, que sustentam a lógica capitalista, baseada em eficiência e legitimidade, levantam discussões em torno da sustentabilidade que camuflam a relação com mercados e preços e o real interesse no lucro, utilizando, assim, a denegação de interesse em prol de discursos "verdes" (BANERJEE, 2008;REDCLIFT, 2006). …”
Section: Desenvolvimento Em Questãounclassified
“…This ambivalence refers to the understanding that the two concepts are part of the same repertoire historically developed around the term, being based, basically, on three foundations. Sustainability: (1) it is presented as an interface issue between "society" and "nature" -and, therefore, hybrid and interdisciplinary (Berkes et al, 2003;McMichael et al, 2003); (2); it was mainly formed by the conceptualization of the natural sciences to the detriment of the social sciences (Drummond, 1997;Palmer et al, 2004) but widespread and suitable for different perspectives and spheres of political action; and, therefore, (3) it appears to be very wide, transiting between the polissemic and the assemic (Nobre, 2002;Redclift, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%