Sustainable Development Efficiency of Cultural Landscape Heritage in Urban Fringe Based on GIS-DEA-MI, a Case Study of Wuhan, China

Abstract

Cultural landscape heritage refers to the rare and irreplaceable cultural landscapes recognized by UNESCO and the World Heritage Committee. It is recognized as a “common works of nature and human beings” of outstanding significance and universal value, and is a type of world heritage. Dueto construction, land isincreasingly limited in urban and rural areasin the process of urbanization, and cultural landscape heritage faces a huge threat, especially larger culturallandscapeheritagelocated at the edgesof cities. However, most of the existing studies have mainly focused on the material protection of heritage but have not paid enough attention to the non-material aspects of heritage sites, failing to reveal the inseparable nature of heritage and land. Therefore, this study takes sustainable development efficiency as its analysis tool, examines two pieces of cultural landscape heritage (the Panlongcheng site and the Tomb of the King of the Ming Dynasty) in the urban edge area of Wuhan, China as examples, innovates and establishes a multidimensional evaluation method based on the GIS-DEA-Ml model, and compares the dynamic changes of the spatial development efficiency and non-spatial development efficiency of the above two cultural landscape heritage cases. The results show that: both the spatial development efficiency and non-spatial development efficiency of Panlongcheng from 2010 to 2019 are significantly higher than that of the Tomb. This method makes up for the deficiency of traditional subjective qualitative analysis. It can be used to study the development efficiency of cultural landscape heritage more objectively and comprehensively, and promote the overall sustainable development of material and intangible cultural heritage. It can provide the basis for early decision-making and post-implementation evaluation for the preservation and utilization of cultural landscape heritage under the background of urban renewal.

Data and Values: Axiological Interpretations of Building Sprawl Landscape Risk in the Rural Territory of Noto (Italy)

“…In Figure 15a, TUs in the yellow gradations represent areas where building pressure is low and landscape value is high, and vice versa for units in the grey gradations. The final results of the description and evaluation process developed so far are a test of the consistency and validity of the proposed model, the ultimate purpose of which is to target future land policies, starting with the amendment of the law that currently regulates building in rural areas [174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182]. Finally, at the top of the pyramid of this integrated landscape risk assessment in rural areas, the Rural Landscape Resilience Index was calculated as a synthesis of the overall qualities of the landscape context and the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the building phenomenon, combining the two previous indices (Figure 15b).…”

“…In Figure 15a, TUs in the yellow gradations represent areas where building pressure is low and landscape value is high, and vice versa for units in the grey gradations. The final results of the description and evaluation process developed so far are a test of the consistency and validity of the proposed model, the ultimate purpose of which is to target future land policies, starting with the amendment of the law that currently regulates building in rural areas [174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182]. The final results of the description and evaluation process developed so far are a test of the consistency and validity of the proposed model, the ultimate purpose of which is to target future land policies, starting with the amendment of the law that currently regulates building in rural areas [174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182].…”

Evaluation on Site Selection of Urban Renewal Projects from the Perspective of Space Benefit: Macau Special Administrative Region as an Example

“…Rasoulzadeh et al [22] proposed a new portfolio Markowitz and cross DEA model to achieve the optimal portfolio by accepting the minimum risk. Zou et al [23] took the Longmencheng site and the Ming Dynasty King's Tomb in Wuhan as examples and invented a multidimensional evaluation method based on the GIS-DEA-Ml model to compare the dynamics of spatial development efciency and nonspatial development efciency of the two cultural landscape heritage cases mentioned above. Te DEA approach can also be applied to site selection for urban renewal benefts.…”

Bibliometric Analysis of Spatial Technology for World Heritage: Application, Trend and Potential Paths

“…In addition, UAV platforms can be paired with high spatial resolution cameras and multispectral sensors to facilitate high-resolution mapping for WHs in real time and with high efficiency [85][86][87][88]. GIS can integrate multiple data sources, such as remote sensing images and practical expeditions to build accurate digital world heritage datasets for long-term monitoring and real-time updates of heritage sites [81,[89][90][91][92][93]. In addition, GIS can be used for the planning and design of world heritage sites and natural resource conservation and is an important tool for the sustainable development of heritage sites.…”