Sustainable energy orientation in higher educational institutions: the effect of institutional pressures and organizational resources in a developing country context

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine the relationship between institutional pressures and sustainable energy orientation by incorporating organizational resources as a mediating factor. Design/methodology/approach The study adopted cross-sectional and correlational research designs using a questionnaire survey of 64 higher educational institutions registered with the National Council for Higher Education of Uganda. The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS. Findings This meant that institutional pressures, particularly mimetic, predict the way organizations chose their energy orientation. Furthermore, partial mediation of organizational resources is evident in the relationship between institutional pressures and sustainable energy orientation. Moreover, resources are a strong factor in ensuring that institutions observe the need for sustainable energy consumption. Research limitations/implications A study where there is no local empirical support for operationalization, as well as coherent citations on the criterion, is bound by various weaknesses that impose on the findings of this study. The authors nonetheless contend that they have opened gates for further empirical tests of their model findings. Practical implications The study findings will enable a catalyzed assessment of the energy needs and planning for them in higher institutions of learning in Uganda. It will trigger policy directions on energy needs and usage control. Social implications Energy supply is important in any academic institution. The study has highlighted a simple model of predictors of energy orientation that will enable institutional planning to ensure social stability with internal stakeholders on energy usage. It will also awaken positive behaviors on energy management by individuals and work groups. Originality/value This study offers initial evidence on the relationship between institutional pressures and sustainable energy orientation using evidence from a developing context. It is based on original study of higher institutions in Uganda, and no such study has been done before with the same variables. It provides new directions for study in such nascent area of critical national dimension as energy and climate change issues are top global agenda.

Institutional pressures and risk governance: testing the mediation role of collectivist orientation among financial institutions in Uganda

“…According to DiMaggio and Powell, (1983) institutional isomorphism occurs through three mechanisms; mimetic, normative and coercive pressures, and these are relevant in explaining risk governance in a firm’s operations. Mimetic pressures refer to the imitation of strategies, systems and the structure of other successful organizations so as to avoid risk and copy with uncertainty (Bagire et al. , 2023; Song and Zhao, 2021).…”

“…, 2023; Song and Zhao, 2021). Coercive pressures stems from formal and informal pressures exerted on a firm by state authorities such as regulations, laws and technical standards of work that influence legitimacy of a firm’s operations (Bagire et al. , 2023; Jabbour and Abdel-Kader, 2016).…”