Sustainable Global Supplier Management: The Role of Dynamic Capabilities in Achieving Competitive Advantage

Abstract

Organizations face increased pressure from stakeholders to incorporate a plethora of corporate responsibility (CR) and sustainability aspects in their business practices. Legal and extra‐legal demands are dynamically changing; almost no organizational function is unaffected. Owing to the outsourcing wave of the last decade, in particular purchasing and supply management (PSM) plays an ever more important role in assuring sustainable production of the firm's products offered in the marketplace. The supply base of many Western firms has become increasingly global and spend volumes have shifted towards emerging countries. In order to avoid the risk of reputational damage to the buying company, the PSM department must ensure that their international suppliers comply with their corporate codes of conduct and that environmental and social misconduct at supplier premises does not occur. In this paper, “sustainability” refers to the pursuit of the tripartite of economic, environmental, and social performance. We contribute to prior research in the fields of sustainability and CR by extending insights of the dynamic capabilities view to analyze how the PSM function integrates sustainability aspects in its global supplier management processes. Based on four case studies in the chemical industry, we propose that profound sustainable global supplier management (SGSM) capabilities are a source of competitive advantage. These capabilities are path dependent and particularly valuable when organizations are receptive to external stakeholder pressure. Early movers in the field of SGSM reap competitive benefits to a notable extent as a result of resource accumulation and learning processes over time.

Piggy in the Middle: How Direct Customer Power Affects First-Tier Suppliers’ Adoption of Socially Responsible Procurement Practices and Performance

“…Although some claim that this investment is difficult to recoup, some studies conclude that there are capability Reuter et al 2010) or corporate sustainability performance advantages (Wolf 2014) to implementing these practices. However, research that tests the link between socially responsible procurement practices and performance finds different outcomes.…”

Ethical Sourcing: An Analysis of the Literature and Implications for Future Research

“…Formal monitoring can help uncover deficits of suppliers at an early stage. In particular, it can provide a buyer with capabilities that a competitor would be unable to copy quickly Reuter et al 2010), while preventing their brand image tarnished by suppliers' misconduct (Awaysheh and Klassen 2010;Klassen and Vereecke 2012). However, such monitoring does not lead to greater supplier compliance (Boyd et al 2007;Baden et al 2009;Lim and Phillips 2008;Jiang 2009).…”

Collaborative Approach for Sustainable Auditing of Global Supply Chains

“…Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become an important component of business activities for many companies in the world considering also supply chain perspective (Carter, Jennings 2004;Pagell, Wu 2009;Seuring, Muller 2008;Pagell et al 2010;Reuter et al 2010). Integrated global supply chains are becoming a critical part of the competitive landscape as firms seek to create strategic advantages (Brondoni, Pepe 2007).…”