2014
DOI: 10.1080/08920753.2014.942028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable Governance of Norwegian Aquaculture and the Administrative Reform: Dilemmas and Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sandersen and Kvalvik (2014) conclude that this has been good for integrated coastal zone management, but may have reduced capacity for larger-scale ecosystem-based management. Sandersen and Kvalvik (2014) conclude that this has been good for integrated coastal zone management, but may have reduced capacity for larger-scale ecosystem-based management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sandersen and Kvalvik (2014) conclude that this has been good for integrated coastal zone management, but may have reduced capacity for larger-scale ecosystem-based management. Sandersen and Kvalvik (2014) conclude that this has been good for integrated coastal zone management, but may have reduced capacity for larger-scale ecosystem-based management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Listen over aktuelle drivkrefter ble utformet basert på en kombinasjon av forfatternes erfaringer fra feltarbeid og analyser av endringer i nordlige kystområder og relevant faglitteratur (e.g. McFadden 2007, Shipman & Stojanovic 2007, Soma & Vatn 2009, Sandersen & Kvalvik 2014, Stokke 2017. Vi ba respondentene oppgi hvorvidt de mente disse virker negativt eller positivt på samfunn og/eller miljø i de nordlige kystområdene.…”
Section: Innledningunclassified
“…In Chile, the government hands‐off approach was widely recognized as the cause of the ISA virus epidemic in 2007 and the ensuing collapse of the industry (Alvial et al ., ). Norwegian aquaculture regulation is considered to be the most rigorous, especially as regards rules on nutrient wastes, fish disease and sea‐louse levels, but has also been criticized for being fragmented and for prioritizing regional economic development over environmental stringency (Liabø et al ., ; Sandersen and Kvalvik, ). In the European Union (EU), aquaculture has not been regulated as a separate sector, but is governed by general, trans‐industry EU rules on feed and food safety, fish health and environmental protection.…”
Section: Global Aquaculture and The Blue Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%