2022
DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2022.2027293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable industrialization performance evaluation of European Union countries: an integrated spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and grey relational analysis approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the recent studies in which GRA has been used, we can indicate evaluation of healthcare service quality factor (Aydemir & Şahin, 2019), measurement of city sustainability (Yi et al, 2021), investigation of life cycle assessment barriers for sustainable development (Kaswan & Rathi, 2021), evaluation of water quality (Tao et al, 2022), and sustainable industrialization performance evaluation of European Union countries (Candan & Cengiz Toklu, 2022). The GRA process steps can be summarized as follows (Wu, 2002;Tzeng & Huang, 2011):…”
Section: Grey Relational Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the recent studies in which GRA has been used, we can indicate evaluation of healthcare service quality factor (Aydemir & Şahin, 2019), measurement of city sustainability (Yi et al, 2021), investigation of life cycle assessment barriers for sustainable development (Kaswan & Rathi, 2021), evaluation of water quality (Tao et al, 2022), and sustainable industrialization performance evaluation of European Union countries (Candan & Cengiz Toklu, 2022). The GRA process steps can be summarized as follows (Wu, 2002;Tzeng & Huang, 2011):…”
Section: Grey Relational Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative data can be obtained directly, while qualitative data are scored by experts to quantify qualitative data. Experts' scoring of quantitative data is based on the actual performance of related companies and the risk classification standards of company A. e expert scores are [0-10], "extremely poor" is [0-2), "poor" is [2][3][4], "moderate" is [4][5][6], and "good" is [6][7][8], "excellent" is [8][9][10]. According to the original data of company A and expert scores, the risk assessment samples are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Simulation Realization Of Enterprise Comprehensivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…e huge e ect of this realistic multiwin model on the participants has made many companies ock to carry out this business. However, when thirdparty logistics companies carry out comprehensive performance evaluation business, the weak concept of risk management and the low level of risk evaluation also restrict comprehensive performance evaluation [3][4][5]. R&D's role in enterprise activities has become increasingly obvious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nguyen et al (2022) established a decision-making framework based on SFSs for the issues of wind turbine supplier selection. Candan and Cengiz Toklu (2022) employed an integrated SF-AHP to measure the sustainable industrialization performance of European Union member countries. By combing the existing literature, it is found that SFSs are enormously advantageous in dealing with uncertain problems, but there is little research on SFSs in the OWF site selection.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Fuzzy Set Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%