Sustainable landscape development and value rigidity: the Pirsig‘s monkey trap

Abstract

New broader, adaptable and accommodating sets of themes have been proposed to help to identify, understand and solve sustainability problems. However, how this knowledge will foster decisions that lead to more desirable outcomes and analyses necessary to transition to sustainability remains a critical theoretical and empirical question for basic and applied research. We argue that we are still underestimating the tendency to lock into certain patterns that come at the cost of the ability to adjust to new situations. This rigidity limits the ability of persons, groups, and companies to respond to new problems, and can make it hard to learn new facts because we pre-select facts as important, or not, in line with our established values. Changing circumstances demand to reappraise values like in the case of Pirsig's monkey and its rice. There is an urgent need to go beyond such local, static and short-term conceptions, where landscape sustainability has been incorrectly envisioned as a durable, stable condition that, once achieved, could persist for generations. We argue that to manage a global transition toward more environmentally efficient and, therefore, more sustainable land-use we have to reappraise societal values at the root of overregulation and rigidity.

Editorial: Agile data-oriented research tools to support smallholder farm system transformation

“…Although a somewhat nebulous concept, it usefully articulates the outcome-oriented nature of the research. Analyses of system transformation generally focus on themes of resilience, robustness, rigidity, adaptability, and transformability (Zurlini et al, 2015;Meuwissen et al, 2019). System transformation (or transition) is complex, long-term, unpredictable, involves many sectors and stakeholders, and entails behavior change (Geels, 2002;Markard et al, 2020).…”

Integrating Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and Ecosystem Services into Spatial Optimization of Urban Functions

“…Fundamental values have been demonstrated to be stable and universal across cultures. However, the hierarchy of values and the types of goals or motives they convey may alter over organizational levels and time [105,106]. As societies mature, human values from diverse economic and cultural backgrounds alter in scale, and the variations in higher-level demands become increasingly relevant.…”

Fifteen years of Landscape Online: Looking back at the development of an e-journal

“…There were several articles related to cultural valuations of landscape, including sacred sites in Morocco (Jäckle et al, 2013), meanings and symbolism of Persian gardens (Farahani et al, 2016), preferences of European mountain regions (Bacher et al, 2016), or about the traditional Umbrian landscape in Italy (Torquati et al, 2017). In addition, Zurlini et al (2015) published a theoretical reflection on sustainable landscape development and value rigidity, demanding to reappraise values like in the case of 'the Pirsig's monkey trap'. However, comparatively few articles were published that had a rather direct natural scientific perspective, e.g., about the variability of vegetation due to climate change (Kullman, 2015), invasive pests (Schimmenti et al, 2017), aquatic Macrophytes (Brummer et al, 2017), and ecological assessments of biodiversity (Räsänen et al, 2015;Veselaj and Mustafa, 2015).…”