The Routledge Handbook of African Linguistics 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315392981-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable language technology for African languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most African languages in general would require the use of rule-based methods, since most of them lack large datasets for probabilistic and Machine Learning approaches. The use of rulebased methods can influence the status of African languages, especially in NLP advancements, where linguistic features can be trained for further analysis, which can further open up possibilities for applications such as parsers, machine translators, information retrieval systems, self-tutored language learning systems and so forth [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most African languages in general would require the use of rule-based methods, since most of them lack large datasets for probabilistic and Machine Learning approaches. The use of rulebased methods can influence the status of African languages, especially in NLP advancements, where linguistic features can be trained for further analysis, which can further open up possibilities for applications such as parsers, machine translators, information retrieval systems, self-tutored language learning systems and so forth [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not much lnguage technology has been developed for these languages. The main exceptions are the works by Arvi Hurskainen on Swahili (for an overviow and references, see Hurskainen (2018)) and the works by Laurette Pretorius, Sonja Bosch and others for Zulu, Xhosa and other South African languages (e.g. Pretorius & Bosch (2009a), Preto-rius & Bosch (2009b).…”
Section: Morphological Analysers and Dictionariesmentioning
confidence: 99%