2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable lifestyles: Framing environmental action in and around the home

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
195
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
195
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, living in a community valuing climate mitigation efforts may make households become engaged in sustainable energy practices (Aall et al, 2007;Barr and Gilg, 2006;. To understand the logic of household energy consumption, one may also analyze empirically the actual economic practices of energy use.…”
Section: Concerned Consumption Global Warming Changing Household Dommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, living in a community valuing climate mitigation efforts may make households become engaged in sustainable energy practices (Aall et al, 2007;Barr and Gilg, 2006;. To understand the logic of household energy consumption, one may also analyze empirically the actual economic practices of energy use.…”
Section: Concerned Consumption Global Warming Changing Household Dommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature contains empirical studies that indicate a positive relationship across domains [10], or activities within the home environment [22,23,24], as well as studies that cannot find such a relationship, [25].…”
Section: Spillovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be framed in scalar terms: the macro-scale (of governments and large corporations), the meso-scale of households and neighbourhoods, and the micro-scale of individual behaviour. While social research in relation to materials recycling and reuse has been conducted at a range of analytical scales, from the macro-scale of changing waste management regimes (Gille 2007, Cooper 2008, Bulkeley et al, 2007, the meso-scale of the household and neighbourhood (Gregson et al 2007, Williams and Widebank 2005, Lane et al 2009, Watson and Lane 2011, through to the micro-scale of individual behaviour (Barr and Gilg 2006), these understandings of social institutions and processes operating at multiple scales have not yet come to inform waste management policy generally or approaches to product stewardship in particular. This may be in part due to the lack of explicit engagement with the themes of IE and EM within social research in this area.…”
Section: Waste and Progress Towards A Sustainable Materials Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research from Australia and the UK shows that consumers are motivated by a range of factors, not just economic dimensions and not just environmental ethics (Hobson, 2003(Hobson, , 2004Gregson and Crewe, 2003;Gregson et al, 2007;Lane et al, 2009;Lane, 2011;Barr and Gilg, 2006;. As the provision of kerbside collection of materials and associated infrastructures have made recycling a great deal more convenient, new social norms have emerged.…”
Section: Agency Responsibility and The Meso-scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation