2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10624-009-9113-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable Mining

Abstract: The mining industry moves more earth than any other human endeavor. Yet mining companies regularly claim to practice sustainable mining. Progressive redefinition of the term sustainability has emptied out the concept of its original reference to the environment. Mining companies now use the term to refer to corporate profits and economic development that will outlast the life of a mining project. The deployment of corporate oxymorons like sustainable mining is one of the key strategies corporations use to conc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Contamination due to mining activities from one mining project for instance, may disturb a wide range of square kilometres and AMD may sterilise the environment, making it unsuitable for plant growth for many years to come. Notwithstanding the undeniable proof of the conservational destruction triggered by excavating coal during the preceding years, the business holistically encouraged the corporate oxymoron of ecological quarrying of land [12]. Therefore, coal-mining companies should control the discharge of AMD into the environment.…”
Section: Effect Of Coal-mining Activities On the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contamination due to mining activities from one mining project for instance, may disturb a wide range of square kilometres and AMD may sterilise the environment, making it unsuitable for plant growth for many years to come. Notwithstanding the undeniable proof of the conservational destruction triggered by excavating coal during the preceding years, the business holistically encouraged the corporate oxymoron of ecological quarrying of land [12]. Therefore, coal-mining companies should control the discharge of AMD into the environment.…”
Section: Effect Of Coal-mining Activities On the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, despite their packaging in the language of partnership and empowerment, and the 'smiling face' with which they are offered (Shever, 2010;) the gifts of development offered by mining corporations are a territorial strategy and a technique to counter opposition. As this work demonstrates, nowadays PR savvy extractive industries 'want to cuddle' (Burton, 2002) offering a range of donations which attempt to rebrand the corporation as compassionate, caring, in partnership with 'local communities' (Zilak, 2004;Rajak, 2009; or refracting the discourses of environmentalism with which they are critiqued to suggest that they are protecting the environment and contributing to local culture (Welker, 2009;Rogers, 2012;Kirsch, 2010). Meanwhile, even as these manoeuvres result in increased conflict, violence and struggle the programmes ensure that the reputation of the corporation is left intact (see in particular Welker, 2009;Zilak, 2004).…”
Section: The Development Gift and Csrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer is that by using such terms the programme and its directors were attempting to elide themselves with morally virtuous disconnected development, avoiding the ethical contamination of patronage and reciprocity, but failing to recognise the complex and morally muddy terrain in which they were operating. Like 'sustainability' they had created an oil company oxymoron (Kirsch, 2010; see also Sawyer, 2010). As Cornwall has pointed out, in 'Development Speak' terms such as empowerment allow a fuzzy, feel-good factor; these are 'words that admit no negatives, words that evoke Good Things that no-one could possibly disagree with.'…”
Section: A Moral Economy Of Disconnection: Corporate Community Engagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More so, Trigger's point amplifies that made by Spivak and Kapoor -that the culture of 'development' related to mining carries with it a discourse in which the company is construed as bringing civilization and modernity to a 'primitive ', undeveloped' situation (Trigger 1997;Kirsch 2010). In such a case the thematic discourses concerned with Mining and Development are as important as are the cultural specificities that work to construct the power relations of that given environment.…”
Section: Discourse and Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For anti-mining thinkers, mining is a 'false promise' of modernity that leads the community to betrayal, disconnection and hardship (Coumans 2011;Kirsch 2010). For the pro-mining and pro-development theorists, there is a 'promise' of modernity off-set by mining that is central to future community well-being and prosperity (World Bank 2010).…”
Section: Discourse and Powermentioning
confidence: 99%