2017
DOI: 10.5593/sgem2017/52/s20.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable Mobility Governance for Urban Municipalities in Latvia: Requirements and Practice of Social-Ecological Systems Approach and Governance Instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure that, a long-term, sustainable transport strategy that would include also the cycling strategy would be needed. This issue was also recognized by the authors in the case studies [14][15], when the authors concluded that municipal planning documents should contain a complex and integrative action plan that would foresee dedicated municipality plans for the implementation of the sustainable mobility concept. This plan should include the integrative urban mobility design that foresees the complimentary use of different transport modes, takes into account three main sustainable mobility categories, respects the views of all stakeholders, as well takes into account the socio-ecological approach, the evaluation of social (health, safety, social problems, culture aspects etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To ensure that, a long-term, sustainable transport strategy that would include also the cycling strategy would be needed. This issue was also recognized by the authors in the case studies [14][15], when the authors concluded that municipal planning documents should contain a complex and integrative action plan that would foresee dedicated municipality plans for the implementation of the sustainable mobility concept. This plan should include the integrative urban mobility design that foresees the complimentary use of different transport modes, takes into account three main sustainable mobility categories, respects the views of all stakeholders, as well takes into account the socio-ecological approach, the evaluation of social (health, safety, social problems, culture aspects etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Single-purpose preference for one mode of transport-most often cycling, with the expression of the success of solving climate problems without the essence of a comprehensive assessment of the quality of life in cities. Many references, for example, can be found in city-wide strategies or agglomeration solutions, for example, [9][10][11][12]. Some research references address descriptively just the subjective issue of human perception of sustainable mobility with a proposal to translate into nationwide regulations as in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%