2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-45293-3_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable Road Infrastructures Using Smart Materials, NDT, and FEM-Based Crack Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. embedded [5][6][7] and non-embedded sensor-based systems [8,9]; 2. mobile [10][11][12] and stationary systems [13][14]; 3. wireless [15,16], wired [17,18] and self-powered systems [19,20]; 4. traditional [21,22] and smart data management [23][24][25]; Despite the promising advantages of the sensor-based solutions, and the growing need of infrastructures in the Internet of Things (IoT) world, it must be underlined that these solutions are sometimes in an early stage of investigation, and that there is a lack of applications in real contexts. Based on the above, the main objective of the presented study is to validate the results of an innovative road pavement monitoring solution with data derived using traditional methods (i.e., GPR, FWD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. embedded [5][6][7] and non-embedded sensor-based systems [8,9]; 2. mobile [10][11][12] and stationary systems [13][14]; 3. wireless [15,16], wired [17,18] and self-powered systems [19,20]; 4. traditional [21,22] and smart data management [23][24][25]; Despite the promising advantages of the sensor-based solutions, and the growing need of infrastructures in the Internet of Things (IoT) world, it must be underlined that these solutions are sometimes in an early stage of investigation, and that there is a lack of applications in real contexts. Based on the above, the main objective of the presented study is to validate the results of an innovative road pavement monitoring solution with data derived using traditional methods (i.e., GPR, FWD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%