2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable school commuting – understanding choices and identifying opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is finding coincides with Kelly and Fu [34] that travel distance to school is the most significant determinant of school travel choice.…”
Section: Effects Of Student-level Travel Feature Variablessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…is finding coincides with Kelly and Fu [34] that travel distance to school is the most significant determinant of school travel choice.…”
Section: Effects Of Student-level Travel Feature Variablessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although the parents can hardly define the exact distance that is ‘too far for walking’, most of them suggested an acceptable maximum of 20 min walking time. This is consistent with the range of 1.6–1.9 km walkable distance as identified by Ermagun et al (2016) based on their econometric analysis of data collected in Iran and a maximum of 2 km from Kelly and Fu (2014) based on GIS and census data of Dublin, Ireland.…”
Section: The Modelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Research show that long distances from home to school and congestion constrain active and/or independent travel (without adult supervision) in favor of the car (Ferdinand et al, 2012 ; Gustat et al, 2014a , b ; Larsen et al, 2015 ). The difference between motorized and non-motorized transportation seems to lie within a limit of 2 km (Kelly and Fu, 2014 ), with parents assessing the suitability of the physical environment before deciding on travel mode (Johansson, 2006 ; Race et al, 2017 ). However, many parents drive their children even though the environment meets walkable requirements (e.g., proximity, the presence of cycle lanes, the location of speed bumps, sidewalk coverage), indicating that additional factors underlie decisions to take the car (Mehdizadeh et al, 2016 ; Mah et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%