2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
296
0
12

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 505 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
296
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Yu & Wong, 2014). Besides, a few studies have also considered social aspects of the TBL in the supplier selection either combined with environmental and economic dimensions or in a separate manner (Amindoust et al, 2012;Baskaran et al, 2012;Buyukozkan & Cifci, 2011;Govindan, Khodaverdi, et al, 2013). However, based on a recent empirical study by and Meixell and Luoma (2015), it was highlighted that incorporating TBL attributes into traditional operations strategies are still at its early stages and more comprehensive treatments should be made to address all three TBL dimensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yu & Wong, 2014). Besides, a few studies have also considered social aspects of the TBL in the supplier selection either combined with environmental and economic dimensions or in a separate manner (Amindoust et al, 2012;Baskaran et al, 2012;Buyukozkan & Cifci, 2011;Govindan, Khodaverdi, et al, 2013). However, based on a recent empirical study by and Meixell and Luoma (2015), it was highlighted that incorporating TBL attributes into traditional operations strategies are still at its early stages and more comprehensive treatments should be made to address all three TBL dimensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these applied techniques include fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FANP) (Buyukozkan & Cifci, 2011), decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) (Chiou et al, 2011), fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) (Chiouy et al, 2011), fuzzy inference system (FIS) (Amindoust et al, 2012), fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) (Govindan (Govindan, Kannan, et al, 2013) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) (Shi et al, 2015). There are also few research activities that tried to combine two or more techniques in order to form a hybrid approach that could perform better than its constituting techniques individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several MADM techniques have been proposed for the SSE problem: analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [34][35][36], analytic network process (ANP) [34], complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) [36][37][38], data envelopment analysis (DEA) [36,[39][40][41], elimination et choix traduisant la realité (ELECTRE) [42,43], preference ranking organization method for enrichment of evaluations (PROMETHEE) [44], technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) [45][46][47][48][49], visekriterijumska optimizacija i kompromisno resenje (VIKOR) [50,51], decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) [52,53], multi-objective optimisation by ratio analysis (MOORA) [54], case based reasoning (CBR) [55], fuzzy inference systems [56,57], genetic algorithm (GA) [58], mathematical and goal programming (MP) [59], simple multi-attribute rating technique (SMART) [60], and their hybrids, among others. In those MADM techniques, the supplier qualification is set according to the valuation given to different relevant factors (qualitative and quantitative) in the evaluation process.…”
Section: Main Methodologies and Factors Used In Sse Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainability is a topic not originally handled by the model, but a concern that affects many business today. When social and environmental concerns are important drivers for procurement decisions, the categorization of suppliers, which originally emphasized the economic aspects, becomes inadequate (Amindoust et al, 2012).…”
Section: Portfolio Model With a Sustainability Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%