2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable supplier selection for SMEs based on an extended PROMETHEE Ⅱ approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, companies including small and medium-sized enterprises have to find strategic ways to deal with sustainable management of their entire operations. One stream of research is attempting to provide practical solutions for imminent industry-related issues related to sustainable supply chain management including supply chain network design [18], sustainable supplier selection [19][20][21], environmental transportation/routing [22,23], and reverse logistics [23]. Another stream of research is seeking the understanding of the current environment and the participants of a supply chain to provide strategic direction for sustainable operation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, companies including small and medium-sized enterprises have to find strategic ways to deal with sustainable management of their entire operations. One stream of research is attempting to provide practical solutions for imminent industry-related issues related to sustainable supply chain management including supply chain network design [18], sustainable supplier selection [19][20][21], environmental transportation/routing [22,23], and reverse logistics [23]. Another stream of research is seeking the understanding of the current environment and the participants of a supply chain to provide strategic direction for sustainable operation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to control variables and keep consistent with the situation of MCDM problem, we firstly deal with the language rating in the two articles. The language level of PLTS is divided into seven levels in Tong et al [ 42 ]. In this paper, we divide linguistic variables into eight levels.…”
Section: Results Discussion and Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the corresponding degree of the language sets, we believe that there is little difference in accuracy between the two articles. Therefore, when the PL-TODIM method in this paper is applied to the cases in [ 42 ], we believe that ignoring the l 0 (none) language set will not affect the final ranking. Finally, the corresponding relationship between the linguistic terms and corresponding degree in PLTS of the two articles is shown in the Table 19 .…”
Section: Results Discussion and Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studies using MCDA, the widely employed methods include the Best-Worst Method (BWM) [43][44][45], Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [46][47][48], Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE)-I and II [49][50][51][52], VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I KOmpromisno Resenje (VIKOR) [53][54][55], Elimination and Choice Translating Reality (ELECTRE) [56,57], Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) [58][59][60], and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) [61][62][63]. Further, the studies that deal with qualitative attributes utilize fuzzified MCDA approaches such as Fuzzy AHP [64,65], Fuzzy TOPSIS [66,67], and many others.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%