2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: A data driven analysis

Abstract: Balancing sustainability and disruption of supply chains requires organizational ambidexterity. Sustainable supply chains prioritize efficiency and economies of scale and may not have sufficient redundancy to withstand disruptive events. There is a developing body of literature that attempts to reconcile these two aspects. This study gives a data-driven literature review of sustainable supply chain management trends toward ambidexterity and disruption. The critical review reveals temporal trends and geographic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
149
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 413 publications
(536 reference statements)
3
149
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, our study suggests that COVID-19 pandemic response strategies can influence supply chain operations like SSS and thus, such strategies can be critical to supply chain sustainability ( Belhadi et al, 2021 ). Consequently, this study corroborates prior studies on sustainable supply chain management from the pandemic perspective ( Bui et al, 2020 , Hendiani et al, 2020 , Karmaker et al, 2021 , Klemes et al, 2020a , Klemes et al, 2020b ). Moreover, by investigating the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on SSS, our study contradicts previous research efforts on sustainable supplier selection that failed to provide the COVID- 19 pandemic perspective to the sustainable supplier selection problem ( Khan et al, 2018 , Luthra et al, 2017 , Orji and Wei, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussion and Management Implicationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As such, our study suggests that COVID-19 pandemic response strategies can influence supply chain operations like SSS and thus, such strategies can be critical to supply chain sustainability ( Belhadi et al, 2021 ). Consequently, this study corroborates prior studies on sustainable supply chain management from the pandemic perspective ( Bui et al, 2020 , Hendiani et al, 2020 , Karmaker et al, 2021 , Klemes et al, 2020a , Klemes et al, 2020b ). Moreover, by investigating the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on SSS, our study contradicts previous research efforts on sustainable supplier selection that failed to provide the COVID- 19 pandemic perspective to the sustainable supplier selection problem ( Khan et al, 2018 , Luthra et al, 2017 , Orji and Wei, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussion and Management Implicationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The modernised, digital, and resilient supply chain systems must deal with the increasing supply chains' demands. Particularly, the start-ups with a vision of cutting costs by restructuring the supply chain operations need the hour for managing the economic shocks, conflicts, and pandemics (Bui et al 2021;Savary et al 2020). The customers radically change their purchasing behaviour and adjust their inventory positions due to such demand disruptions in the pandemics like COVID-19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, some researchers have also made quantitative analyses on their fields by the method similar to us. Bui et al [ 16 ] evaluated 273 keywords and 22 indicators obtained based on the experts’ advice by entropy weight method, fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory in supply chains. Huang et al [ 17 ] used two historical data-driven weight calculation approaches including Entropy Weight Method (EWM) and Scatter Degree Method (SDM) to solve the risk assessment of railway dangerous goods transportation system (RDGTS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [ 18 ] applied principal component analysis (PCA), entropy method and random forest to calculate weighted coefficients of key metrics when assessing the ecological health of large rivers. But references [ 16 , 17 , 18 ] just used the traditional entropy method and didn’t improve the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%