User Behavior and Technology Development
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5196-8_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable technologies and everyday life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars who endorse a social practices approach emphasize the interaction between motivation and context and hence choose a unit of analysis that is rather specific to a particular setting or application (Spaargaren 2003; Spaargaren et al 2006; Guy and Shove 2007; McMeekin and Southerton 2007; Gram‐Hanssen 2007, 2008; Kjellberg 2008; Quitzau and Røpke 2008; Wilhite 2008; Røpke 2009). For example, efforts to realign transportation preferences from this perspective should not concentrate on the physical dimensions of mobility but rather should focus on commuting, shopping, family visits, or beach holidays.…”
Section: Changes Toward Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars who endorse a social practices approach emphasize the interaction between motivation and context and hence choose a unit of analysis that is rather specific to a particular setting or application (Spaargaren 2003; Spaargaren et al 2006; Guy and Shove 2007; McMeekin and Southerton 2007; Gram‐Hanssen 2007, 2008; Kjellberg 2008; Quitzau and Røpke 2008; Wilhite 2008; Røpke 2009). For example, efforts to realign transportation preferences from this perspective should not concentrate on the physical dimensions of mobility but rather should focus on commuting, shopping, family visits, or beach holidays.…”
Section: Changes Toward Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As greenhouse gas emissions associated with energy use have become central to climate and energy policy, so too has the demand for energy become a principle area of interest for social scientists across (sub-) disciplines including Human Geography, Anthropology, Sociology and STS. The growing interest in energy demand has been accompanied by a distinct shift in focus away from the attitudes, behaviours and choices of individuals (Shove 2010), towards an engagement with how energy use is constituted socially and materially (Guy 2006, Maassen 2009 (Spaargaren, 2011;Spaargaren et al, 2006;Stephenson et al, 2010;Strengers, 2011Strengers, , 2009Wilson andChatterton, 2011 Gram-Hanssen, 2011). Whilst this research has significantly advanced our understanding of how and why energy is used and the possibilities and limits of 'behaviour change' as a means for reducing demand, its predominant focus on the domestic sphere as the site through which energy use is constituted has limited its engagement with the dynamics of wider energy systems and a rather abstract engagement with the nature and properties of energy itself (Strengers & Maller 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spaargaren's model might be regarded as a bridge between the classic instrumental, environmental attitude and behavior approach and a more emancipatory, agency-based approach. At the same time, the model takes into account the influence of social (technological) structures on behavior (Spaargaren et al, 2006). Figure 3 presents Spaargaren's social practices model.…”
Section: Blended Environmental Education Communication and Participmentioning
confidence: 99%