Sustainable Travel Decision-Making of Europeans: Insights from a Household Survey

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to research the antecedents of the sustainable travel decision-making of European travelers and thereby identify important lessons for the transition towards sustainable travel and tourism. The study is based on data collected through a representative survey, conducted in five European countries, with a sample of n = 5024 respondents. The results of descriptive statistics, EFA (Exploratory Factor Analysis) and FA (Factor Analysis) are presented in order to explore sustainable travel decision-making through environmental (policy-related and personal) attitudes and travel mode decision priorities in the European context. Furthermore, the study provides new evidence regarding the under-researched phenomenon of the attitude–behavior gap by presenting a model for the sustainability-oriented decision-making of travelers, including attitudes and travel mode priorities as antecedents. The results confirm the existence of moral licensing in travel decision-making, thereby extending the relevance of this theory into travel and tourism, which has not been done before. The denial of environmental issues is also being researched as regards its interaction with positive environmental attitudes, environmental travel mode priorities and non-environmental travel priorities, thereby advancing our understanding of the interplay between these categories. The interplay between the four categories furthers our understanding of the perplexity of travelers in terms of sustainable travel decision-making.

Flying High in Academia—Willingness of University Staff to Perform Low-Carbon Behavior Change in Business Travel

“…This could be a result of the overall high scores for pro-environmental self-image, which has a positive effect on the willingness to reduce flying. However, previous studies have shown that neither environmental awareness (Árnadóttir et al, 2021), nor stated behavior intentions necessarily translate into actual behavior changes (Gehlert et al, 2013;Nikolić et al, 2021). Therefore, it is questionable whether the higher willingness we found in this study is truly indicative of a greater degree of actual behavior change.…”

Is Being Responsible Sustainable in Tourism? Connections and Critical Differences

“…Blackstock et al [10], for example, state that responsible tourism thinking guides our focus towards actions by individuals who are influenced by ethics and social norms. While ethical principles or shared social norms are not purely individualistic but shared, their impacts on our actions are interpreted and understood as being based on individual behavior and decision-making processes in tourism consumption and production [54]. Indeed, the core idea of responsible tourism refers to tourism with a focus on the ethical and moral responsibility of those engaged in tourism operations, namely tourists and entrepreneurs [10].…”

Nature Tourism on the Colombian—Ecuadorian Amazonian Border: History, Current Situation, and Challenges

“…Security problems affect 60% of the countries which are highly dependent on tourism. Aspects such as personal safety, cost, travel time, comfort, and flexibility influence travelers' decisions when choosing a destination for vacationing [18,19]. Regarding personal safety, it has been demonstrated in the literature that the reliability of police services is the sixth most relevant indicator distinguishing developed from developing destinations [20].…”