2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable urban development? Low-cost housing challenges in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…70 Therefore by providing the poor with an asset in terms of shelter; basic connector services such as water, sanitation and internal roads; as well as secure tenure, the housing programme has contributed significantly to alleviating poverty. 71 Clearly the housing spending patterns are an unequivocal government commitment to alleviate poverty through housing provision; 72 however the government has since 1994 encountered numerous challenges relating to the delivering housing to the poor.…”
Section: Housing Budget Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70 Therefore by providing the poor with an asset in terms of shelter; basic connector services such as water, sanitation and internal roads; as well as secure tenure, the housing programme has contributed significantly to alleviating poverty. 71 Clearly the housing spending patterns are an unequivocal government commitment to alleviate poverty through housing provision; 72 however the government has since 1994 encountered numerous challenges relating to the delivering housing to the poor.…”
Section: Housing Budget Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The costs related to large scale housing development, force new low-cost projects to the urban periphery, where land is more freely available and attained at more competitive prices. Since the advent of democracy in 1994, low-cost housing delivery has mostly involved building serviced townships on urban peripheries, thus perpetuating the phenomenon of urban sprawl and the ails associated therewith [5,6]. According to Pieterse [7] (cited in Fieuw [6]) the failure of the democratic government to transform the urban structures of the past has intensified urban sprawl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further problem is related to housing beneficiaries who (in some cases) capitalise on their new property assets by generating a rental income [5,11,12]. This phenomenon is known as the informal backyard rental sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The daunting nature of the challenge of sustainable community development in the complex socio-technical space of urban informal settlements is evident in the paradox between the South African constitution's assertion of individual rights to housing, water and sanitation, and the agonizingly slow, conflictual and often failed process of attempting to realize these rights [3,4]. In Cape Town, only 10,000 new homes are provided annually, against an estimated backlog of 400,000 eligible families [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worse yet, the standard "sites and services" approach to upgrading settlements through greenfield or "rollover" development is highly disruptive and contentious, and is much more successful in serving the interests of private developers than poor people's need for healthy, sustainable communities [4]. In 2005, the national government adopted a new housing policy, Breaking New Ground [6], that opens up new opportunities for communities to shape their own development trajectory through incremental in situ settlement upgrading strategies that are more "people-centered," avoid mass relocations, and build on existing community strengths and institutions [3]. Despite these "housing" policy developments and national and local embrace of sustainability goals and policies, few examples exist in Cape Town today of compelling, sustainable approaches to successful informal settlement upgrading [though see 7 for one case study in early development].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%