2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable use of mangroves as sources of valuable medicinal compounds: Species identification, propagation and secondary metabolite composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adhesion has been reduced in all the models except for E. coli , where adhesion was promoted in the presence of the B. cylindrica extract. Glasenapp et al reported an inhibitory activity of tannins extracted from L. racemosa against C. albicans cell adhesion [21]. The tannin casuarinin was also present in the crude extract used in this study, and was therefore likely important in the observed reduction of biofilm cell adhesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Adhesion has been reduced in all the models except for E. coli , where adhesion was promoted in the presence of the B. cylindrica extract. Glasenapp et al reported an inhibitory activity of tannins extracted from L. racemosa against C. albicans cell adhesion [21]. The tannin casuarinin was also present in the crude extract used in this study, and was therefore likely important in the observed reduction of biofilm cell adhesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The signal of methyl gallate was likely a breakdown product from epigallocatechin 3,5-digallate. The tannin casuarinin was identified by the presence of the double-charged ion at m/z 467.03, and its fragments were compared to the data measured by Glasenapp et al [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the relationships among major evolutionary lineages within the family (e.g., the four subfamilies) as well as the generic limits within the largest subfamily (Acanthoideae) remain unresolved (e.g., McDade et al., ). Furthermore, the phylogenetic relationships in several smaller clades are currently not well understood (e.g., in Avicennia L. [Glasenapp et al., ], Barleria L. [Darbyshire et al., ], Dyschoriste Nees [Chumchim et al., ], Thunbergioideae T. Anderson [Borg et al., ], Ruellia L. [Tripp et al., ]). In addition to this obstacle, the rooting of the Acanthaceae phylogeny is uncertain, as interfamilial relationships in Lamiales remain elusive (Schäferhoff et al., ; Refulio‐Rodriguez and Olmstead, ; Stull et al., ; Wikström et al., ; Chase et al., ; Sarzi et al., ; Xu et al., ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%