2016
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2015.222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustained lung inflation in late preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies using a prophylactic approach with a fixed duration of SI [31,33] have shown a nonsignificant increase in the rate of pneumothorax from 1 to 6% (OR = 4.57; 95% CI: 0.97-21.5; p = 0.06) [31] and from 0 to 3% (p = 0.08) [33]. Only one more case was found in our study, despite the application of repeated SIs associated with much higher PEEPs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Two studies using a prophylactic approach with a fixed duration of SI [31,33] have shown a nonsignificant increase in the rate of pneumothorax from 1 to 6% (OR = 4.57; 95% CI: 0.97-21.5; p = 0.06) [31] and from 0 to 3% (p = 0.08) [33]. Only one more case was found in our study, despite the application of repeated SIs associated with much higher PEEPs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Sustained inflation is currently standard practice in parts of Europe 9 based on studies in animals, asphyxiated term infants, 4 and smaller human randomized clinical trials in both preterm and near-term infants. 7,8,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Previous studies showed a reduction in mechanical ventilation within the first 72 hours of life 27,28 in infants receiving sustained inflation. Two meta-analyses 7,8 found a short-term benefit of sustained inflation, but a Cochrane review 8 suggested caution in interpretation of pooled analyses, noting marked interstudy heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two meta-analyses 7,8 found a short-term benefit of sustained inflation, but a Cochrane review 8 suggested caution in interpretation of pooled analyses, noting marked interstudy heterogeneity. Prior smaller studies included more mature infants, 27,[31][32][33][34][35] involved shorter inspiratory durations, 29 reported surrogate outcomes, 29,35 had important co-interventions, 27 or were stopped early for futility. 30 This trial used sustained in-flations with peak pressures that were similar to prior studies 27,28,30 and durations similar to some.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among those born < 28 weeks of gestational age, there was a lower need for intubation in the group that received a sustained inflation (29% vs 63%, p = 0.05), but this was not a pre-specified analysis [ 20 ]. In contrast to those promising results in moderately or extremely prematurely born infants, in infants born at 34–36 weeks of gestational age there were no significant differences in the need for respiratory support, the incidence of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission for respiratory distress or the total length of NICU stay between infants who received a 15-s sustained inflation and those who received standard resuscitation according to the American Association of Pediatrics guidelines (drying, stimulation and, if inadequate respiratory effort or a heart rate < 100 bpm, positive pressure ventilation at 40–60 inflations per minute) [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%