ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/roman.2005.1513864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustaining interaction dynamics and engagement in dyadic child-robot interaction kinesics: lessons learnt from an exploratory study

Abstract: Abstract-Motivated by questions of interaction design forHuman-Robot Interaction (HRI), an exploratory initial study was carried out with children and a robotic "pet" in order to improve understanding the design space for interaction with an autonomous robot. Interactions were very unstructured in a relaxing and familiar environment. The scope of the study was quite broad in order to cover a wide range of possibly relevant types of interactions. The study of the resulting interaction dynamics -with rich and wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13]). It is not always clear when the robot or human partner should start interaction in taking a turn.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13]). It is not always clear when the robot or human partner should start interaction in taking a turn.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More on the topic of timing, Robins et al [19], working with robots rather than virtual humans, conclude qualitatively from an exploratory study about "Rhythm, kinesics, body motion and timing" that "[...] responding with appropriate timing so as to mesh with the timing of human actions encourages sustained interaction" and "Robot-human temporal interaction kinesics will eventually need to be studied deeply in order to put this dimension within the purview of HRI designers".…”
Section: Synchrony In Natural Interaction With Virtual Humans and Socmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a face is humanoid, what level of realism is optimal? What role could timing in communication [25] and the movement and timing of interactive behaviour (kinesics [21], [1]) play?…”
Section: B Designing Robots For Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%