Since the notion of funds of identity was first proposed, a large number of related works have followed, most of which have been reviewed recently by Hogg and Volman (2020). This special issue is a step forward both in the conceptualization of the construct, and in its educational applications. Three developments in particular are considered. The first deals with the directive and prospective nature of funds of identity, linked to the higher psychological processes, such as imagination, agency or creativity. Second, there is the idea of establishing identity work as a curricular subject in itself, and as a vehicle for the critical understanding/transformation of oneself and of one's surrounding reality. Third, the range of methodological resources and educational practices that are used to identify, generate and exploit funds of identity is increasingly. The notion of funds of identity is furthermore reconceptualized in two ways: first as an ongoing, subjective, social and cultural, generative-directive process, grounded in our embodied experience of the world and in social interactions, and second, as symbolic resources that are used to give meaning to oneself and help to project, plan and organize life projects, and a critical understanding of reality.The funds of identity theory emerged within the framework of the funds of knowledge approach (González et al., 2005), and had a three-fold objective. The first was to complement the original unit of analysis (i.e., the learners' households' practices and resources) by taking into account the learners' own voices, as well as the contexts of their lives and activities, and their own particular skills, hobbies and knowledge -independently of whether they are derived from their families' funds of knowledge or from elsewhere.In this sense, it was recognized that funds of knowledge literature, since its beginnings in the 1980s, had perhaps placed too much emphasis on the voices, perspectives and practices of adults (Rios-Aguilar et al., 2011). That is, the funds of knowledge in question derived from the sociocultural practices of the members of a household, such as the professional, religious or community experiences of parents, guardians, grandparents, aunts or uncles, and included knowledge and skills relating to, for example, gardening, construction, domestic economy, and languages used, among other things (see the reviews by Hogg, 2011;. Therefore, it was suggested that the funds of knowledge approach -whose beneficial impacts have been documented in a number of studies Volman & Gilde, 2021;Whyte & Karabon, 2016) -tends to adopt an adult-centric perspective (for a critical analysis, see Oughton, 2010 and Zhang-Yu et al. in this special issue). This was the justification for incorporating the learners' own practices and experiences, regardless of whether or not they coincide with the funds of knowledge that their families accumulate and have at their disposal. This is an especially critical aspect given that identity appears in a child's development as an important C...