Phenotypic and phylogenetic studies were performed on an unknown gram-negative, strictly anaerobic, rod-shaped bacterium isolated from human clinical specimens. This organism was indole negative, resistant to 20% bile, produced acetic and a lesser amount of succinic acids as the major end products of glucose metabolism, and possessed a G؉C content of approximately 43 mol%. Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequencing demonstrated that the unidentified bacterium was a member of the Cytophaga-Flavobacter-Bacteroides phylum of gram-negative bacteria and formed a close association (with an average sequence similarity of 93.6%) with the second subcluster of the Porphyromonas cluster in the Bacteroides subgroup. Phylogenetically and phenotypically it resembled Bacteroides merdae; however, a 16S rRNA gene sequence divergence of approximately 5.5% between the unknown bacterium and B. merdae, as well as distinguishable biochemical characteristics, demonstrate that the unknown bacterium is genotypically and phenotypically distinct and represents a previously unknown subline within the Porphyromonas phylogenetic cluster. The taxonomy of Bacteroides has undergone significant changes in the past few years (8). Studies have shown that the genus Bacteroides contained species representing several genera. A majority of the species previously included in the genus Bacteroides have been placed in the genera Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Bacteroides sensu stricto (9-11). Several other genera have subsequently been described for Bacteroides species which do not conform to these three major groups (e.g., Anaerorhabdus, Dichelobacter, Dialister, Fibrobacter, Megamonas, Mitsuokella, Rikenella, Sebaldella, Tannerella, Tissierella, and Alistipes). The taxonomic positions of some other species still included in the genus, such as Bacteroides distasonis and Bacteroides merdae, remain uncertain; all of these species will ultimately be transferred to other genera (6). Furthermore, several clinically important species still await formal description.In this paper, we report on the characterization of a group of isolates which were recovered from clinical specimens of human intestinal origin. Phenotypically, the unknown bacterium is very much like B. merdae; these strains were misidentified as B. merdae previously. However, 16S rRNA sequencing reveals approximately 5.5% sequence divergence between the novel species and its phylogenetically closest species, B. merdae. A DNA-DNA hybridization study also confirmed that this unknown organism was indeed distinct from its nearest valid species, B. merdae. Based on the phenotypic and phylogenetic findings presented here, a new species, "Bacteroides goldsteinii," is proposed. In addition, we describe the phenotypic tests useful in distinguishing between this novel organism and its related taxa. (Table 1). The novel isolates were recovered from clinical sources, such as peritoneal fluid, appendix tissue, and intra-abdominal abscess; therefore, they are likely of intestinal origin. All the clinical isolates of...