2019
DOI: 10.14245/ns.1836188.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swallowing Function Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With and Without Anterior Plating: A SWAL-QOL (Swallowing-Quality of Life) and Radiographic Assessment

Abstract: ObjectiveAnterior cervical plating in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures are associated with improved outcomes compared to stand-alone cages. However, concerns exist regarding increased rates of postoperative dysphagia following an ACDF. This study aims to quantify the effect of anterior plating on swallowing-quality of life (SWAL-QOL) scores and radiographic swelling assessments following a primary, single-level ACDF. MethodsPatients retrospectively reviewed. Patients grouped into those… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Miyamoto et al reported recurrent osteophyte formation in all seven patients and revision surgery in two, Mattioli et al reported that only 1 of 21 patients experienced asymptomatic recurrence at 9 years after surgery [ 1 , 27 ]. Anterior plate fixation, some argue, may cause additional esophageal compression, while others claim that the plate itself is not relevant to swallowing difficulty and could act as a physical barrier and suppress bony overgrowth [ 28 , 29 ]. Chung et al reported that simple osteophytectomy alone tended to yield more favorable results than additional plate fixation on the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Miyamoto et al reported recurrent osteophyte formation in all seven patients and revision surgery in two, Mattioli et al reported that only 1 of 21 patients experienced asymptomatic recurrence at 9 years after surgery [ 1 , 27 ]. Anterior plate fixation, some argue, may cause additional esophageal compression, while others claim that the plate itself is not relevant to swallowing difficulty and could act as a physical barrier and suppress bony overgrowth [ 28 , 29 ]. Chung et al reported that simple osteophytectomy alone tended to yield more favorable results than additional plate fixation on the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The questionnaire is among the few dysphagia evaluation tools which has demonstrated correlation with severity of swallowing difficulty in patients with cervical spine deformity or degenerative pathology. 20,[25][26][27] While this tool effectively evaluates and quantifies dysphagia, its relationship with other PROMs is less established. In addition, the clinical implications of swallowing difficulty with respect to its effect on other areas of a patient's postoperative recovery have largely remained underreported in the spine surgery literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some, including the present authors, consider that screw and plate fixation can cause additional esophageal compression, 28 while others argue that a plate itself is not relevant to swallowing difficulties. 29 Theoretically, a plate and screws would occupy space and contribute to PVST narrowing; however , it may also act as a physical barrier and suppress bony overgrowth. It is not certain that fixation surgery with a plate is superior or inferior to simple osteophytectomy in DISH-phagia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%